Significant lead-induced tricuspid regurgitation is associated with poor prognosis at long-term follow-up

Background Although the presence of an RV lead is a potential cause of tricuspid regurgitation (TR), the clinical impact of significant lead-induced TR is unknown. Objective To evaluate the effect of significant lead-induced TR on cardiac performance and long-term outcome after cardioverter-defibril...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2014-06, Vol.100 (12), p.960-968
Hauptverfasser: Höke, Ulas, Auger, Dominique, Thijssen, Joep, Wolterbeek, Ron, van der Velde, Enno T, Holman, Eduard R, Schalij, Martin J, Bax, Jeroen J, Delgado, Victoria, Marsan, Nina Ajmone
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Although the presence of an RV lead is a potential cause of tricuspid regurgitation (TR), the clinical impact of significant lead-induced TR is unknown. Objective To evaluate the effect of significant lead-induced TR on cardiac performance and long-term outcome after cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or pacemaker implantation. Methods A retrospective cohort of 239 ICD (n=191) or pacemaker (n=48) recipients (age 60±14 years, 77% male) from a tertiary care university hospital, with an echocardiographic evaluation before and within 1–1.5 years after device implantation were included. Significant lead-induced TR was defined as TR worsening, reaching a grade ≥2 at follow-up echocardiography. During long-term follow-up (median 58, IQR 35–76 months), all-cause mortality and heart failure related events were recorded. Results Before device implantation, most patients had TR grade 1 or 2 (64.0%) or no TR (33.9%), but after lead placement, significant TR was seen in 91 patients (38%). Changes in cardiac volumes and function at follow-up were similar between patients with and without significant lead-induced TR, except for larger RV diastolic area (17±6mm2 vs 16±5mm2, p=0.009), larger right atrial diameter (39±10 mm vs 36±8 mm, p
ISSN:1355-6037
1468-201X
DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304673