Cancer survival figures are misleading

2 Survival is a perfectly valid measure for comparisons within randomised control trials but is misleading for comparisons across time and place. 3 The apparent increases in survival since 1971 are, unfortunately, unlikely to be the result of improvements in cancer treatment alone as the article see...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ (Online) 2014-05, Vol.348 (may19 15), p.g3315-g3315
1. Verfasser: Oke, Jason L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:2 Survival is a perfectly valid measure for comparisons within randomised control trials but is misleading for comparisons across time and place. 3 The apparent increases in survival since 1971 are, unfortunately, unlikely to be the result of improvements in cancer treatment alone as the article seems to claim.(29 April.) 2 Wegwarth O, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Gaissmaier W, Gigerenzer G. Do physicians understand cancer screening statistics? A national survey of primary care physicians in the United States.
ISSN:0959-8138
1756-1833
1756-1833
DOI:10.1136/bmj.g3315