Contrast agent bolus tracking with a fixed threshold or a manual fast start for coronary CT angiography

Objectives Comparison of bolus tracking with a fixed threshold versus a manual fast start for coronary CT angiography. Methods We retrospectively analysed 320-row coronary CT angiography of 50 patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. Twenty-five examinations were initiated by a bolu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2014-06, Vol.24 (6), p.1229-1238
Hauptverfasser: Stenzel, Fabian, Rief, Matthias, Zimmermann, Elke, Greupner, Johannes, Richter, Felicitas, Dewey, Marc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives Comparison of bolus tracking with a fixed threshold versus a manual fast start for coronary CT angiography. Methods We retrospectively analysed 320-row coronary CT angiography of 50 patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. Twenty-five examinations were initiated by a bolus tracking method (group 1), 25 examinations with a manual fast surestart (group 2). Results Mean attenuation values in the ascending aorta were 519 ± 111 Hounsfield units (HU) in group 1 and 476 ± 65 HU in group 2 ( p  = 0.10). Assessable vessel lengths were 171 ± 44 mm vs 172 ± 29 mm for the right coronary artery ( p  = 0.91), 11 ± 4 mm vs 12 ± 4 mm for the left main ( p  = 0.9), 163 ± 28 mm vs 151 ± 26 mm for the left anterior descending coronary artery ( p  = 0.11) and 125 ± 41 mm vs 110 ± 37 mm for the left circumflex coronary artery ( p  = 0.18). Image quality for all coronary arteries was not significantly different between the groups ( p  > 0.41). The attenuation ratio between the left and right ventricle was 2.8 ± 0.7 vs 3.6 ± 1.0 ( p  = 0.003). Significantly less contrast agent was used in group 2 (64 ± 6 ml vs 80 ± 0 ml; p  
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-014-3148-3