Contrast agent bolus tracking with a fixed threshold or a manual fast start for coronary CT angiography
Objectives Comparison of bolus tracking with a fixed threshold versus a manual fast start for coronary CT angiography. Methods We retrospectively analysed 320-row coronary CT angiography of 50 patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. Twenty-five examinations were initiated by a bolu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European radiology 2014-06, Vol.24 (6), p.1229-1238 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives
Comparison of bolus tracking with a fixed threshold versus a manual fast start for coronary CT angiography.
Methods
We retrospectively analysed 320-row coronary CT angiography of 50 patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. Twenty-five examinations were initiated by a bolus tracking method (group 1), 25 examinations with a manual fast surestart (group 2).
Results
Mean attenuation values in the ascending aorta were 519 ± 111 Hounsfield units (HU) in group 1 and 476 ± 65 HU in group 2 (
p
= 0.10). Assessable vessel lengths were 171 ± 44 mm vs 172 ± 29 mm for the right coronary artery (
p
= 0.91), 11 ± 4 mm vs 12 ± 4 mm for the left main (
p
= 0.9), 163 ± 28 mm vs 151 ± 26 mm for the left anterior descending coronary artery (
p
= 0.11) and 125 ± 41 mm vs 110 ± 37 mm for the left circumflex coronary artery (
p
= 0.18). Image quality for all coronary arteries was not significantly different between the groups (
p
> 0.41). The attenuation ratio between the left and right ventricle was 2.8 ± 0.7 vs 3.6 ± 1.0 (
p
= 0.003). Significantly less contrast agent was used in group 2 (64 ± 6 ml vs 80 ± 0 ml;
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00330-014-3148-3 |