Is Poor Performance on NBME Clinical Subject Examinations Associated With a Failing Score on the USMLE Step 3 Examination?

PURPOSETo investigate the association between poor performance on National Board of Medical Examiners clinical subject examinations across six core clerkships and performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 3 examination. METHODIn 2012, the authors studied matriculants from t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic Medicine 2014-05, Vol.89 (5), p.762-766
Hauptverfasser: Dong, Ting, Swygert, Kimberly A, Durning, Steven J, Saguil, Aaron, Zahn, Christopher M, DeZee, Kent J, Gilliland, William R, Cruess, David F, Balog, Erin K, Servey, Jessica T, Welling, David R, Ritter, Matthew, Goldenberg, Matthew N, Ramsay, Laura B, Artino, Anthony R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:PURPOSETo investigate the association between poor performance on National Board of Medical Examiners clinical subject examinations across six core clerkships and performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 3 examination. METHODIn 2012, the authors studied matriculants from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences with available Step 3 scores and subject exam scores on all six clerkships (Classes of 2007–2011, N = 654). Poor performance on subject exams was defined as scoring one standard deviation (SD) or more below the mean using the national norms of the corresponding test year. The association between poor performance on the subject exams and the probability of passing or failing Step 3 was tested using contingency table analyses and logistic regression modeling. RESULTSStudents performing poorly on one subject exam were significantly more likely to fail Step 3 (OR 14.23 [95% CI 1.7–119.3]) compared with students with no subject exam scores that were 1 SD below the mean. Poor performance on more than one subject exam further increased the chances of failing (OR 33.41 [95% CI 4.4–254.2]). This latter group represented 27% of the entire cohort, yet contained 70% of the students who failed Step 3. CONCLUSIONSThese findings suggest that individual schools could benefit from a review of subject exam performance to develop and validate their own criteria for identifying students at risk for failing Step 3.
ISSN:1040-2446
1938-808X
DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000222