Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between “Ideal” and “Nonideal” Transobturator Male Sling Patients for Treatment of Postprostatectomy Incontinence
Objective To review the clinical outcomes of “ideal” vs “nonideal” postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence (PPI) patients who underwent male sling placement. Methods The medical records of 95 consecutive patients with PPI who underwent male sling insertion (AdVance male sling, American Medical...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2014-05, Vol.83 (5), p.1186-1189 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective To review the clinical outcomes of “ideal” vs “nonideal” postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence (PPI) patients who underwent male sling placement. Methods The medical records of 95 consecutive patients with PPI who underwent male sling insertion (AdVance male sling, American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN) were reviewed. Patients were divided into “ideal” vs “nonideal” cohorts. The ideal group consisted of patients with mild to moderate incontinence ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0090-4295 1527-9995 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.urology.2013.12.061 |