Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between “Ideal” and “Nonideal” Transobturator Male Sling Patients for Treatment of Postprostatectomy Incontinence

Objective To review the clinical outcomes of “ideal” vs “nonideal” postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence (PPI) patients who underwent male sling placement. Methods The medical records of 95 consecutive patients with PPI who underwent male sling insertion (AdVance male sling, American Medical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2014-05, Vol.83 (5), p.1186-1189
Hauptverfasser: Sturm, R.M, Guralnick, M.L, Stone, A.R, Bales, G.T, Dangle, P.P, O'Connor, R.C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To review the clinical outcomes of “ideal” vs “nonideal” postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence (PPI) patients who underwent male sling placement. Methods The medical records of 95 consecutive patients with PPI who underwent male sling insertion (AdVance male sling, American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN) were reviewed. Patients were divided into “ideal” vs “nonideal” cohorts. The ideal group consisted of patients with mild to moderate incontinence (
ISSN:0090-4295
1527-9995
DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2013.12.061