Reducing attrition in drug development: smart loading preclinical safety assessment

•Twenty percent of potential new drugs are stopped for safety reasons in the GLP phase alone.•Fifty percent were attributed to toxicities seen within 2 weeks, or to acute CV risks.•Could a new approach avoid at least some of these failures? Entry into the crucial preclinical good laboratory practice (GLP) stage of toxicology testing triggers significant R&D investment yet >20% of AstraZeneca's potential new medicines have been stopped for safety reasons in this GLP phase alone. How could we avoid at least some of these costly failures? An analysis of historical toxicities that caused stopping (‘stopping toxicities’) showed that >50% were attributable to target organ toxicities emerging within 2 weeks of repeat dosing or to acute cardiovascular risks. By frontloading 2-week repeat-dose toxicity studies and a comprehensive assessment of cardiovascular safety, we anticipate a potential 50% reduction in attrition in the GLP phase. This will reduce animal use overall, save significant R&D costs and improve drug pipeline quality.