Interconversion of η3‑H2SiRR′ σ‑Complexes and 16-Electron Silylene Complexes via Reversible H–H or C–H Elimination

Solid samples of η3-silane complexes [PhBPPh 3]RuH(η3-H2SiRR′) (R,R′ = Et2, 1a; PhMe, 1b; Ph2, 1c, MeMes, 1d) decompose when exposed to dynamic vacuum. Gas-phase H2/D2 exchange between isolated, solid samples of 1c- d 3 and 1c indicate that a reversible elimination of H2 is the first step in the irr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Chemical Society 2014-04, Vol.136 (16), p.6092-6102
Hauptverfasser: Lipke, Mark C, Neumeyer, Felix, Tilley, T. Don
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Solid samples of η3-silane complexes [PhBPPh 3]RuH(η3-H2SiRR′) (R,R′ = Et2, 1a; PhMe, 1b; Ph2, 1c, MeMes, 1d) decompose when exposed to dynamic vacuum. Gas-phase H2/D2 exchange between isolated, solid samples of 1c- d 3 and 1c indicate that a reversible elimination of H2 is the first step in the irreversible decomposition. An efficient solution-phase trap for hydrogen, the 16-electron ruthenium benzyl complex [PhBPPh 3]Ru[η3-CH2(3,5-Me2C6H3)] (3) reacts quantitatively with H2 in benzene via elimination of mesitylene to form the η5-cyclohexadienyl complex [PhBPPh 3]Ru(η5-C6H7) (4). This H2 trapping reaction was utilized to drive forward and quantify the elimination of H2 from 1b,d in solution, which resulted in the decomposition of 1b,d to form 4 and several organosilicon products that could not be identified. Reaction of {[PhBPPh 3]Ru(μ-Cl)}2 (2) with (THF)2Li(SiHMes2) forms a new η3-H2Si species [PhBPPh 3]Ru[CH2(2-(η3-H2SiMes)-3,5-Me2C6H2)] (5) which reacts with H2 to form the η3-H2SiMes2 complex [PhBPPh 3]RuH(η3-H2SiMes2) (1e). Complex 1e was identified by NMR spectroscopy prior to its decomposition by elimination of Mes2SiH2 to form 4. DFT calculations indicate that an isomer of 5, the 16-electron silylene complex [PhBPPh 3]Ru(μ-H)(SiMes2), is only 2 kcal/mol higher in energy than 5. Treatment of 5 with XylNC (Xyl = 2,6-dimethylphenyl) resulted in trapping of [PhBPPh 3]Ru(μ-H)(SiMes2) to form the 18-electron silylene complex [PhBPPh 3]Ru(CNXyl)(μ-H)(SiMes2) (6). A closely related germylene complex [PhBPPh 3]Ru[CN(2,6-diphenyl-4-MeC6H2)](H)(GeH t Bu) (8) was prepared from reaction of t BuGeH3 with the benzyl complex [PhBPPh 3]Ru[CN(2,6-diphenyl-4-MeC6H2)][η1-CH2(3,5-Me2C6H3)] (7). Single crystal XRD analysis indicated that unlike for 6, the hydride ligand in 8 is a terminal hydride that does not engage in 3c-2e Ru–H → Ge bonding. Complex 1b is an effective precatalyst for the catalytic Ge–H dehydrocoupling of t BuGeH3 to form ( t BuGeH2)2 (85% yield) and H2.
ISSN:0002-7863
1520-5126
DOI:10.1021/ja501803w