Circulating endothelial cell levels in psoriatic patients and their modification after an anti-TNF-alpha (Etanercept) treatment

Background Endothelial function in psoriatic patients has been mainly evaluated through a high‐resolution ultrasound measurement of flow‐mediated vasodilation in the brachial artery, which is an operator‐dependent and technically demanding technique: this characteristic, together with different pati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2014-05, Vol.28 (5), p.590-596
Hauptverfasser: De Simone, C., Caldarola, G., Coco, V., Palumbo, S., Pocino, K., Sgambato, A., Maiorino, A., Corbi, M., Sandri, M.T., Vendittelli, F., Capoluongo, E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Endothelial function in psoriatic patients has been mainly evaluated through a high‐resolution ultrasound measurement of flow‐mediated vasodilation in the brachial artery, which is an operator‐dependent and technically demanding technique: this characteristic, together with different patient selection criteria, could account for the conflicting results emerging from different studies. Recently, Circulating Endothelial Cells (CECs) level has been suggested as a novel biomarker of vascular injury. Methods The number of CECs was determined by a semi‐automated immunomagnetic system (CellSearch system) in peripheral blood of psoriatic patients (n = 48) and healthy subjects (n = 50). In 15 patients, CEC level was also evaluated after 6 months of treatment with an anti–TNF‐alpha agent, Etanercept. The plasma levels of high‐sensitivity C‐reactive Protein (CRP), E‐selectin, VEGF and PAI‐1 were measured by ELISA. The psoriasis severity was assessed by PASI score. Results A statistically significant difference (P = 0.001) was found between CEC level in psoriatic patients (10.6 ± 9.4 cells/mL) vs. the control group (3.9 ± 0.9 cells/mL). This count inversely correlated with sE‐selectin levels (r2 = 0.16; P = 0.03). After 6 months of therapy, patients experienced a significant (P 
ISSN:0926-9959
1468-3083
DOI:10.1111/jdv.12140