The impact of dosimetric inadequacy on treatment outcome of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with IMRT

Summary Background and Purpose This study aims to address the relationship between tumor size and dosimetric inadequacy in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and how it subsequently affects the local control. Material and Methods 444 NPC patients treated with IMRT from 2005 to 2010 were includ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oral oncology 2014-05, Vol.50 (5), p.506-512
Hauptverfasser: Ng, Wai Tong, Lee, Michael C.H, Chang, Amy T.Y, Chan, Oscar S.H, Chan, Lucy L.K, Cheung, Foon Yiu, Hung, Wai Man, Chan, Connie C.C, Lee, Anne W.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background and Purpose This study aims to address the relationship between tumor size and dosimetric inadequacy in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and how it subsequently affects the local control. Material and Methods 444 NPC patients treated with IMRT from 2005 to 2010 were included in the study. The planning aim was to deliver at least 66.5 Gy (i.e. 95% of 70 Gy) to 95% of the primary gross tumor volume (GTV_P) while keeping all the critical neurological organs at risk (OAR) within dose tolerance. Treatment outcome were analyzed according to T stage, GTV_P volume and the degree of under-dosing. Results Disease outcome was related to T stage, GTV_P volume and the degree of under-dosing. The 5-year local failure free survival (LFFS), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for T4 disease were 74%, 50.4% and 63.6% respectively. 48 cm3 was identified as the critical cut-off GTV_P volume, the large volume group (GTV_P ⩾ 48 cm3 ) had lower 5-year DFS (50.4% vs. 76.6%) and OS (65.2% vs. 86.3%, p < 0.001). Most T4 diseases (and some T3) were under-dosed (
ISSN:1368-8375
1879-0593
DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.01.017