Mechanisms of atrial mitral regurgitation: insights using 3D transoesophageal echo

Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is a consequence of mitral annular enlargement, leaflet tethering and reduced co-aptation. The importance of the left atrium (LA) as a cause of mitral regurgitation (MR) is less clear. We applied a co-aptation index using three-dimensional (3D) transoesophageal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal cardiovascular imaging 2014-05, Vol.15 (5), p.500-508
Hauptverfasser: Ring, Liam, Dutka, David P, Wells, Francis C, Fynn, Simon P, Shapiro, Leonard M, Rana, Bushra S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is a consequence of mitral annular enlargement, leaflet tethering and reduced co-aptation. The importance of the left atrium (LA) as a cause of mitral regurgitation (MR) is less clear. We applied a co-aptation index using three-dimensional (3D) transoesophageal echocardiography to FMR and MR secondary to LA dilatation (atrial mitral regurgitation, AMR). Seventy-two patients underwent comprehensive 3D echo studies: FMR (n = 19); AMR (n = 33); and 20 controls. We recorded: LV size and function; LA dimensions; mitral annular area (MVA); and leaflet area in early and late systole. MVA fractional change was defined: (MVA late systole - MVA early systole)/MVA late systole × 100%; the co-aptation index was defined: (leaflet area early systole - leaflet area late systole)/leaflet area early systole × 100%. Despite normal LV size and function in AMR, MVA was increased similarly to FMR (AMR 12.86 cm(2) vs. FMR 12.33 cm(2), P = ns; both P < 0.01 vs. controls 8.83 cm(2)), and MVA fractional change similarly reduced (AMR 5.1% vs. FMR 6.3%; P = ns; both P < 0.001 vs. controls 14.6%). The co-aptation index was reduced in both MR groups (FMR 6.6% vs. AMR 7.0%, P = ns; both P < 0.001 vs. controls 19.6%). After multivariate analysis, the co-aptation index (χ(2) = 41.2) and MVA fractional change (χ(2) = 22.1) remained the strongest predictors of MR (both P < 0.001 for the model). A co-aptation index of ≤13% was 96% sensitive and 90% specific for the presence of MR. LA dilatation leads to MVA enlargement, reduced leaflet co-aptation and MR even without LV dilatation. A co-aptation index describes this in vivo. This work provides insights into the mechanism of AMR.
ISSN:2047-2404
2047-2412
DOI:10.1093/ehjci/jet191