Limited subtotal gastrectomy for early remnant gastric cancer

Background Detection of early remnant gastric cancer (ERGC) is increasing as a result of the development of endoscopic technology and a surveillance program. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of limited subtotal gastrectomy (SG) surgery for ERGC compared to total gastrectomy (TG). Methods We retrospectively reviewed a database of 72 consecutive patients with remnant gastric cancer who underwent laparotomy at the National Cancer Center Hospital East between January 1993 and December 2008. Thirty-five patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ERGC underwent curative resection: 13 SG and 22 conventional TG. Patients and tumor characteristics, operative results, and postoperative assessments 1 year after surgery were compared between the two groups. Results Operating time, blood transfusion, and hospital stay were similar in the two groups. In the SG group, blood loss and postoperative recovery of body weight tended to be better than in the TG group. There was no dumping syndrome in the SG group, while this occurred in three patients in the TG group. The levels of hemoglobin and total protein were higher 1 year after remnant gastrectomy in the SG group than in the TG group. No recurrence of gastric cancer was detected in the SG group during median follow-up of 99.2 months. Conclusion In comparison to TG, limited SG surgery for ERGC improved the postoperative course, with no recurrence of cancer. Therefore, SG is a safe and effective treatment for ERGC.