Virus, protozoa and organic compounds decay in depurated oysters

(1) Evaluate the dynamic of the depuration process of Crassostrea gigas oysters using different ultraviolet doses with different amounts of contaminants (virus, protozoa and organic contaminants) and (2) investigate the morphological changes in the oysters' tissues produced by the depuration pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of food microbiology 2013-11, Vol.167 (3), p.337-345
Hauptverfasser: Souza, Doris Sobral Marques, Piazza, Rômi Sharon, Pilotto, Mariana Rangel, Nascimento, Mariana de Almeida do, Moresco, Vanessa, Taniguchi, Satie, Leal, Diego Averaldo Guiguet, Schmidt, Éder Carlos, Cargin-Ferreira, Eduardo, Bícego, Márcia Caruso, Sasaki, Silvio Tarou, Montone, Rosalinda Carmela, de Araujo, Rafael Alves, Franco, Regina Maura Bueno, Bouzon, Zenilda Laurita, Bainy, Afonso Celso Dias, Barardi, Célia Regina Monte
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:(1) Evaluate the dynamic of the depuration process of Crassostrea gigas oysters using different ultraviolet doses with different amounts of contaminants (virus, protozoa and organic contaminants) and (2) investigate the morphological changes in the oysters' tissues produced by the depuration procedures. The oysters were allocated in sites with different degrees of contamination and analyzed after 14days. Some animals were used as positive controls by artificial bioaccumulation with HAdV2 and MNV1 and subjected to depuration assays using UV lamps (18 or 36W) for 168h. The following pollutants were researched in the naturally contaminated oysters, oysters after 14days in sites and oysters during the depuration processes: virus (HAdV, HAV, HuNoV GI/GII and JCPyV), by (RT) qPCR; protozoa (Cryptosporidium and Giardia species), by immunomagnetic separation and immunofluorescence; and organic compounds (AHs, PAHs, LABs, PCBs and organochlorine pesticides—OCs), by chromatography. Changes in the oysters' tissues produced by the depuration processes were also evaluated using histochemical analysis by light microscopy. In the artificially bioaccumulated oysters, only HAdV2 and MNV1 were investigated by (RT) qPCR before the depuration procedures and after 96 and 168h of these procedures. At 14days post-allocation, HAdV was found in all the sites (6.2×105 to 4.4×107GCg−1), and Giardia species in only one site. Levels of PCBs and OCs in the oyster's tissues were below the detection limit for all samples. AHs (3.5 to 4.4μgg−1), PAHs (11 to 191ngg−1) and LABs (57 to 751ngg−1) were detected in the samples from 3 sites. During the depuration assays, we found HAdV, Giardia and Cryptosporidium species until 168h, independent of UV treatment. AHs, PAHs and LABs were found also after 168h of depuration (36W and without UV lamp). The depuration procedures did not produce changes in the oysters' tissues. In the artificially contaminated and depurated oysters, we detected HAdV until 168h and MNV1 until 96h of depuration. The applied depuration treatments were unable to eliminate the protozoa or to degrade the HAdV genomes but were able to degrade the MNV1 genomes. Similarly, the UV water treatment was not efficient for aliphatic hydrocarbons, PAHs and LABs, as their concentrations were equivalent or higher to the concentrations of the control samples and samples from depuration tanks without UV treatment. •The behavior of viruses, protozoa and organic compounds during oyster depur
ISSN:0168-1605
1879-3460
DOI:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.09.019