Subnational Islamization through Secular Parties: Comparing Shari'a Politics in Two Indonesian Provinces

The Arab Spring has reinvigorated debate about the impact of Islamist groups on policymaking, particularly the adoption and implementation of Islamic law (shari'a), in democratizing, Muslim-majority countries. Most studies emphasize the causal primacy of Islamist parties in shari'a policym...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Comparative politics 2013-10, Vol.46 (1), p.63-82
1. Verfasser: Buehler, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 82
container_issue 1
container_start_page 63
container_title Comparative politics
container_volume 46
creator Buehler, Michael
description The Arab Spring has reinvigorated debate about the impact of Islamist groups on policymaking, particularly the adoption and implementation of Islamic law (shari'a), in democratizing, Muslim-majority countries. Most studies emphasize the causal primacy of Islamist parties in shari'a policymaking. Yet, determining policy agendas is almost never under the absolute control of one group. This is especially true for democratizing, Muslim-majority countries where decades of authoritarian rule have allowed secular elites to become deeply entrenched in state institutions. Field research in Indonesia shows that shari'a policymaking is politically mediated between secular elites and a broad range of Islamist forces situated both inside and outside the formal political arena.
doi_str_mv 10.5129/001041513807709347
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1512213892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>cuny/cp/2013/00000046/00000001/art00005</ingid><jstor_id>43664333</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43664333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4877-f4b198d735a24e3c9075539b421ec176ca7d6659292bbe7291b7246f09658b663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhq0KJELhDyBV8g0uW_ztNReEon5EqiBSytnyOt7E0cYOtrdV--vrbQoXhPBlZux3npHnBeADRuccE_UZIYwY5pi2SEqkKJMnYEbqRSMIka_AbBI0VaHegLc572rJBGtnYLsau2CKj8EMcJEHs_ePzyUs2xTHzRaunB0Hk-DSpOJd_gLncX8wyYcNXG1r_GjgMg6-eJuhD_D2PsJFWMfgsjcBLlO888G6_A687s2Q3fuXeAp-Xl7czq-bmx9Xi_m3m8ayVsqmZx1W7VpSbghz1CokOaeqYwQ7i6WwRq6F4Ioo0nVOEoU7SZjokRK87YSgp-DTkXtI8dfoctF7n60bBhNcHLPG9dtIUszo_6V1taSuVJEqJUepTTHn5Hp9SH5v0oPGSE8O6L8dqE1nx6ZdLjH96WBUiDp9mv_9-F536UIxehfHVH3I2lttx_DwG6r0HRMBa4IIRgq1GhPK9dr1ZhyKLibpzaPOvAK__gP4TLOHSsC0UqfDxEuCsK7WTgmnT04Xrw8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1512213892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subnational Islamization through Secular Parties: Comparing Shari'a Politics in Two Indonesian Provinces</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Ingenta Connect</source><creator>Buehler, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Buehler, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>The Arab Spring has reinvigorated debate about the impact of Islamist groups on policymaking, particularly the adoption and implementation of Islamic law (shari'a), in democratizing, Muslim-majority countries. Most studies emphasize the causal primacy of Islamist parties in shari'a policymaking. Yet, determining policy agendas is almost never under the absolute control of one group. This is especially true for democratizing, Muslim-majority countries where decades of authoritarian rule have allowed secular elites to become deeply entrenched in state institutions. Field research in Indonesia shows that shari'a policymaking is politically mediated between secular elites and a broad range of Islamist forces situated both inside and outside the formal political arena.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4159</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-6227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5129/001041513807709347</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>City University of New York</publisher><subject>Democratization ; Fieldwork ; Government regulation ; Implementation ; Indonesia ; Islam ; Islamic Countries ; Islamic Law ; Local government ; Majority groups ; Muslims ; New order ; Parliaments ; Plurality voting ; Policy Making ; Political Parties ; Political regulation ; Radicalism ; Secularism ; Sharia</subject><ispartof>Comparative politics, 2013-10, Vol.46 (1), p.63-82</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 City University of New York</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4877-f4b198d735a24e3c9075539b421ec176ca7d6659292bbe7291b7246f09658b663</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43664333$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43664333$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>289,314,778,782,801,27907,27908,58000,58233</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buehler, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Subnational Islamization through Secular Parties: Comparing Shari'a Politics in Two Indonesian Provinces</title><title>Comparative politics</title><addtitle>Comp Politics</addtitle><description>The Arab Spring has reinvigorated debate about the impact of Islamist groups on policymaking, particularly the adoption and implementation of Islamic law (shari'a), in democratizing, Muslim-majority countries. Most studies emphasize the causal primacy of Islamist parties in shari'a policymaking. Yet, determining policy agendas is almost never under the absolute control of one group. This is especially true for democratizing, Muslim-majority countries where decades of authoritarian rule have allowed secular elites to become deeply entrenched in state institutions. Field research in Indonesia shows that shari'a policymaking is politically mediated between secular elites and a broad range of Islamist forces situated both inside and outside the formal political arena.</description><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Fieldwork</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Indonesia</subject><subject>Islam</subject><subject>Islamic Countries</subject><subject>Islamic Law</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Majority groups</subject><subject>Muslims</subject><subject>New order</subject><subject>Parliaments</subject><subject>Plurality voting</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Political Parties</subject><subject>Political regulation</subject><subject>Radicalism</subject><subject>Secularism</subject><subject>Sharia</subject><issn>0010-4159</issn><issn>2151-6227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhq0KJELhDyBV8g0uW_ztNReEon5EqiBSytnyOt7E0cYOtrdV--vrbQoXhPBlZux3npHnBeADRuccE_UZIYwY5pi2SEqkKJMnYEbqRSMIka_AbBI0VaHegLc572rJBGtnYLsau2CKj8EMcJEHs_ePzyUs2xTHzRaunB0Hk-DSpOJd_gLncX8wyYcNXG1r_GjgMg6-eJuhD_D2PsJFWMfgsjcBLlO888G6_A687s2Q3fuXeAp-Xl7czq-bmx9Xi_m3m8ayVsqmZx1W7VpSbghz1CokOaeqYwQ7i6WwRq6F4Ioo0nVOEoU7SZjokRK87YSgp-DTkXtI8dfoctF7n60bBhNcHLPG9dtIUszo_6V1taSuVJEqJUepTTHn5Hp9SH5v0oPGSE8O6L8dqE1nx6ZdLjH96WBUiDp9mv_9-F536UIxehfHVH3I2lttx_DwG6r0HRMBa4IIRgq1GhPK9dr1ZhyKLibpzaPOvAK__gP4TLOHSsC0UqfDxEuCsK7WTgmnT04Xrw8</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Buehler, Michael</creator><general>City University of New York</general><general>The City University of New York</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Subnational Islamization through Secular Parties: Comparing Shari'a Politics in Two Indonesian Provinces</title><author>Buehler, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4877-f4b198d735a24e3c9075539b421ec176ca7d6659292bbe7291b7246f09658b663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Fieldwork</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Indonesia</topic><topic>Islam</topic><topic>Islamic Countries</topic><topic>Islamic Law</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Majority groups</topic><topic>Muslims</topic><topic>New order</topic><topic>Parliaments</topic><topic>Plurality voting</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Political Parties</topic><topic>Political regulation</topic><topic>Radicalism</topic><topic>Secularism</topic><topic>Sharia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buehler, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Comparative politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buehler, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Subnational Islamization through Secular Parties: Comparing Shari'a Politics in Two Indonesian Provinces</atitle><jtitle>Comparative politics</jtitle><stitle>Comp Politics</stitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>63-82</pages><issn>0010-4159</issn><eissn>2151-6227</eissn><abstract>The Arab Spring has reinvigorated debate about the impact of Islamist groups on policymaking, particularly the adoption and implementation of Islamic law (shari'a), in democratizing, Muslim-majority countries. Most studies emphasize the causal primacy of Islamist parties in shari'a policymaking. Yet, determining policy agendas is almost never under the absolute control of one group. This is especially true for democratizing, Muslim-majority countries where decades of authoritarian rule have allowed secular elites to become deeply entrenched in state institutions. Field research in Indonesia shows that shari'a policymaking is politically mediated between secular elites and a broad range of Islamist forces situated both inside and outside the formal political arena.</abstract><pub>City University of New York</pub><doi>10.5129/001041513807709347</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-4159
ispartof Comparative politics, 2013-10, Vol.46 (1), p.63-82
issn 0010-4159
2151-6227
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1512213892
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Ingenta Connect
subjects Democratization
Fieldwork
Government regulation
Implementation
Indonesia
Islam
Islamic Countries
Islamic Law
Local government
Majority groups
Muslims
New order
Parliaments
Plurality voting
Policy Making
Political Parties
Political regulation
Radicalism
Secularism
Sharia
title Subnational Islamization through Secular Parties: Comparing Shari'a Politics in Two Indonesian Provinces
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T13%3A09%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subnational%20Islamization%20through%20Secular%20Parties:%20Comparing%20Shari'a%20Politics%20in%20Two%20Indonesian%20Provinces&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20politics&rft.au=Buehler,%20Michael&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=63-82&rft.issn=0010-4159&rft.eissn=2151-6227&rft_id=info:doi/10.5129/001041513807709347&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43664333%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1512213892&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ingid=cuny/cp/2013/00000046/00000001/art00005&rft_jstor_id=43664333&rfr_iscdi=true