Subnational Islamization through Secular Parties: Comparing Shari'a Politics in Two Indonesian Provinces
The Arab Spring has reinvigorated debate about the impact of Islamist groups on policymaking, particularly the adoption and implementation of Islamic law (shari'a), in democratizing, Muslim-majority countries. Most studies emphasize the causal primacy of Islamist parties in shari'a policym...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Comparative politics 2013-10, Vol.46 (1), p.63-82 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 82 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 63 |
container_title | Comparative politics |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Buehler, Michael |
description | The Arab Spring has reinvigorated debate about the impact of Islamist groups on policymaking, particularly the adoption and implementation of Islamic law (shari'a), in democratizing, Muslim-majority countries. Most studies emphasize the causal primacy of Islamist parties in shari'a
policymaking. Yet, determining policy agendas is almost never under the absolute control of one group. This is especially true for democratizing, Muslim-majority countries where decades of authoritarian rule have allowed secular elites to become deeply entrenched in state institutions. Field
research in Indonesia shows that shari'a policymaking is politically mediated between secular elites and a broad range of Islamist forces situated both inside and outside the formal political arena. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5129/001041513807709347 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1512213892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>cuny/cp/2013/00000046/00000001/art00005</ingid><jstor_id>43664333</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43664333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4877-f4b198d735a24e3c9075539b421ec176ca7d6659292bbe7291b7246f09658b663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhq0KJELhDyBV8g0uW_ztNReEon5EqiBSytnyOt7E0cYOtrdV--vrbQoXhPBlZux3npHnBeADRuccE_UZIYwY5pi2SEqkKJMnYEbqRSMIka_AbBI0VaHegLc572rJBGtnYLsau2CKj8EMcJEHs_ePzyUs2xTHzRaunB0Hk-DSpOJd_gLncX8wyYcNXG1r_GjgMg6-eJuhD_D2PsJFWMfgsjcBLlO888G6_A687s2Q3fuXeAp-Xl7czq-bmx9Xi_m3m8ayVsqmZx1W7VpSbghz1CokOaeqYwQ7i6WwRq6F4Ioo0nVOEoU7SZjokRK87YSgp-DTkXtI8dfoctF7n60bBhNcHLPG9dtIUszo_6V1taSuVJEqJUepTTHn5Hp9SH5v0oPGSE8O6L8dqE1nx6ZdLjH96WBUiDp9mv_9-F536UIxehfHVH3I2lttx_DwG6r0HRMBa4IIRgq1GhPK9dr1ZhyKLibpzaPOvAK__gP4TLOHSsC0UqfDxEuCsK7WTgmnT04Xrw8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1512213892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subnational Islamization through Secular Parties: Comparing Shari'a Politics in Two Indonesian Provinces</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Ingenta Connect</source><creator>Buehler, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Buehler, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>The Arab Spring has reinvigorated debate about the impact of Islamist groups on policymaking, particularly the adoption and implementation of Islamic law (shari'a), in democratizing, Muslim-majority countries. Most studies emphasize the causal primacy of Islamist parties in shari'a
policymaking. Yet, determining policy agendas is almost never under the absolute control of one group. This is especially true for democratizing, Muslim-majority countries where decades of authoritarian rule have allowed secular elites to become deeply entrenched in state institutions. Field
research in Indonesia shows that shari'a policymaking is politically mediated between secular elites and a broad range of Islamist forces situated both inside and outside the formal political arena.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4159</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-6227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5129/001041513807709347</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>City University of New York</publisher><subject>Democratization ; Fieldwork ; Government regulation ; Implementation ; Indonesia ; Islam ; Islamic Countries ; Islamic Law ; Local government ; Majority groups ; Muslims ; New order ; Parliaments ; Plurality voting ; Policy Making ; Political Parties ; Political regulation ; Radicalism ; Secularism ; Sharia</subject><ispartof>Comparative politics, 2013-10, Vol.46 (1), p.63-82</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 City University of New York</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4877-f4b198d735a24e3c9075539b421ec176ca7d6659292bbe7291b7246f09658b663</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43664333$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43664333$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>289,314,778,782,801,27907,27908,58000,58233</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buehler, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Subnational Islamization through Secular Parties: Comparing Shari'a Politics in Two Indonesian Provinces</title><title>Comparative politics</title><addtitle>Comp Politics</addtitle><description>The Arab Spring has reinvigorated debate about the impact of Islamist groups on policymaking, particularly the adoption and implementation of Islamic law (shari'a), in democratizing, Muslim-majority countries. Most studies emphasize the causal primacy of Islamist parties in shari'a
policymaking. Yet, determining policy agendas is almost never under the absolute control of one group. This is especially true for democratizing, Muslim-majority countries where decades of authoritarian rule have allowed secular elites to become deeply entrenched in state institutions. Field
research in Indonesia shows that shari'a policymaking is politically mediated between secular elites and a broad range of Islamist forces situated both inside and outside the formal political arena.</description><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Fieldwork</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Indonesia</subject><subject>Islam</subject><subject>Islamic Countries</subject><subject>Islamic Law</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Majority groups</subject><subject>Muslims</subject><subject>New order</subject><subject>Parliaments</subject><subject>Plurality voting</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Political Parties</subject><subject>Political regulation</subject><subject>Radicalism</subject><subject>Secularism</subject><subject>Sharia</subject><issn>0010-4159</issn><issn>2151-6227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhq0KJELhDyBV8g0uW_ztNReEon5EqiBSytnyOt7E0cYOtrdV--vrbQoXhPBlZux3npHnBeADRuccE_UZIYwY5pi2SEqkKJMnYEbqRSMIka_AbBI0VaHegLc572rJBGtnYLsau2CKj8EMcJEHs_ePzyUs2xTHzRaunB0Hk-DSpOJd_gLncX8wyYcNXG1r_GjgMg6-eJuhD_D2PsJFWMfgsjcBLlO888G6_A687s2Q3fuXeAp-Xl7czq-bmx9Xi_m3m8ayVsqmZx1W7VpSbghz1CokOaeqYwQ7i6WwRq6F4Ioo0nVOEoU7SZjokRK87YSgp-DTkXtI8dfoctF7n60bBhNcHLPG9dtIUszo_6V1taSuVJEqJUepTTHn5Hp9SH5v0oPGSE8O6L8dqE1nx6ZdLjH96WBUiDp9mv_9-F536UIxehfHVH3I2lttx_DwG6r0HRMBa4IIRgq1GhPK9dr1ZhyKLibpzaPOvAK__gP4TLOHSsC0UqfDxEuCsK7WTgmnT04Xrw8</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Buehler, Michael</creator><general>City University of New York</general><general>The City University of New York</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Subnational Islamization through Secular Parties: Comparing Shari'a Politics in Two Indonesian Provinces</title><author>Buehler, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4877-f4b198d735a24e3c9075539b421ec176ca7d6659292bbe7291b7246f09658b663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Fieldwork</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Indonesia</topic><topic>Islam</topic><topic>Islamic Countries</topic><topic>Islamic Law</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Majority groups</topic><topic>Muslims</topic><topic>New order</topic><topic>Parliaments</topic><topic>Plurality voting</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Political Parties</topic><topic>Political regulation</topic><topic>Radicalism</topic><topic>Secularism</topic><topic>Sharia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buehler, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Comparative politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buehler, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Subnational Islamization through Secular Parties: Comparing Shari'a Politics in Two Indonesian Provinces</atitle><jtitle>Comparative politics</jtitle><stitle>Comp Politics</stitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>63-82</pages><issn>0010-4159</issn><eissn>2151-6227</eissn><abstract>The Arab Spring has reinvigorated debate about the impact of Islamist groups on policymaking, particularly the adoption and implementation of Islamic law (shari'a), in democratizing, Muslim-majority countries. Most studies emphasize the causal primacy of Islamist parties in shari'a
policymaking. Yet, determining policy agendas is almost never under the absolute control of one group. This is especially true for democratizing, Muslim-majority countries where decades of authoritarian rule have allowed secular elites to become deeply entrenched in state institutions. Field
research in Indonesia shows that shari'a policymaking is politically mediated between secular elites and a broad range of Islamist forces situated both inside and outside the formal political arena.</abstract><pub>City University of New York</pub><doi>10.5129/001041513807709347</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-4159 |
ispartof | Comparative politics, 2013-10, Vol.46 (1), p.63-82 |
issn | 0010-4159 2151-6227 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1512213892 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Ingenta Connect |
subjects | Democratization Fieldwork Government regulation Implementation Indonesia Islam Islamic Countries Islamic Law Local government Majority groups Muslims New order Parliaments Plurality voting Policy Making Political Parties Political regulation Radicalism Secularism Sharia |
title | Subnational Islamization through Secular Parties: Comparing Shari'a Politics in Two Indonesian Provinces |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T13%3A09%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subnational%20Islamization%20through%20Secular%20Parties:%20Comparing%20Shari'a%20Politics%20in%20Two%20Indonesian%20Provinces&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20politics&rft.au=Buehler,%20Michael&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=63-82&rft.issn=0010-4159&rft.eissn=2151-6227&rft_id=info:doi/10.5129/001041513807709347&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43664333%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1512213892&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ingid=cuny/cp/2013/00000046/00000001/art00005&rft_jstor_id=43664333&rfr_iscdi=true |