Subnational Islamization through Secular Parties: Comparing Shari'a Politics in Two Indonesian Provinces

The Arab Spring has reinvigorated debate about the impact of Islamist groups on policymaking, particularly the adoption and implementation of Islamic law (shari'a), in democratizing, Muslim-majority countries. Most studies emphasize the causal primacy of Islamist parties in shari'a policym...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Comparative politics 2013-10, Vol.46 (1), p.63-82
1. Verfasser: Buehler, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Arab Spring has reinvigorated debate about the impact of Islamist groups on policymaking, particularly the adoption and implementation of Islamic law (shari'a), in democratizing, Muslim-majority countries. Most studies emphasize the causal primacy of Islamist parties in shari'a policymaking. Yet, determining policy agendas is almost never under the absolute control of one group. This is especially true for democratizing, Muslim-majority countries where decades of authoritarian rule have allowed secular elites to become deeply entrenched in state institutions. Field research in Indonesia shows that shari'a policymaking is politically mediated between secular elites and a broad range of Islamist forces situated both inside and outside the formal political arena.
ISSN:0010-4159
2151-6227
DOI:10.5129/001041513807709347