Differences Between Manufacturers in Reported Power Wheelchair Repairs and Adverse Consequences Among People With Spinal Cord Injury
Abstract Objective To compare the frequency of power wheelchair (PWC) repairs and consequences experienced over a 6-month period by individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) who use a PWC ≥40h/wk, based on manufacturer, seating functions, Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) group, and...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2014-04, Vol.95 (4), p.597-603 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 603 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 597 |
| container_title | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
| container_volume | 95 |
| creator | Worobey, Lynn, PhD Oyster, Michelle, MS Pearlman, Jonathan, PhD Gebrosky, Benjamin, BS Boninger, Michael L., MD |
| description | Abstract Objective To compare the frequency of power wheelchair (PWC) repairs and consequences experienced over a 6-month period by individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) who use a PWC ≥40h/wk, based on manufacturer, seating functions, Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) group, and model, and over time. Design Convenience observational sample survey. Setting Spinal Cord Injury Model System centers. Participants Individuals with SCI (N=945) who use a PWC ≥40h/wk. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Number of required wheelchair repairs and resulting consequences (ie, being stranded, missing work/school, or missing a medical appointment). Results Rates of required repairs (47.6%–63.3%) and consequences (26.7%–40.7%) were high across manufacturers. Differences between manufacturers were found among PWCs without seating functions ( P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.022 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1511820571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0003999313012458</els_id><sourcerecordid>1511820571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-70319d4732ae5e610ee08208d449c0f0843b64af3922567a6f24829345e8e5283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EokvhD3BAPnJJ8NjOl4SQluWrUhEVBZWb5ToT1iGxg5202js_HEdbOHDgNBr5mVeeZwh5CiwHBuWLPtfTGHLOQOQAOeP8HtlAIXhWc_h2n2wYYyJrmkackEcx9qktCwEPyQmXooSqLjfk1xvbdRjQGYz0Nc63iI5-1G7ptJmXgCFS6-hnnHyYsaUX_hYDvdojDmavbVhfUolUu5Zu25vEI915F_Hncszcjt59pxfopwHplZ339HKyTg-JCi09c_0SDo_Jg04PEZ_c1VPy9d3bL7sP2fmn92e77XlmJMCcVUxA08pKcI0FlsAQWc1Z3UrZGNaxWorrUupONJwXZaXLjsuaN0IWWGPBa3FKnh9zp-DT_-KsRhsNDoN26JeooABIgUUFCeVH1AQfY8BOTcGOOhwUMLXaV71a7avVvgJQyX4aenaXv1yP2P4d-aM7AS-PAKYtbywGFY1dPbU2oJlV6-3_81_9M24G66zRww88YOz9EpLZtIeKXDF1ud5_PT8IBlwWtfgNj2Kq-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1511820571</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences Between Manufacturers in Reported Power Wheelchair Repairs and Adverse Consequences Among People With Spinal Cord Injury</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Worobey, Lynn, PhD ; Oyster, Michelle, MS ; Pearlman, Jonathan, PhD ; Gebrosky, Benjamin, BS ; Boninger, Michael L., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Worobey, Lynn, PhD ; Oyster, Michelle, MS ; Pearlman, Jonathan, PhD ; Gebrosky, Benjamin, BS ; Boninger, Michael L., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To compare the frequency of power wheelchair (PWC) repairs and consequences experienced over a 6-month period by individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) who use a PWC ≥40h/wk, based on manufacturer, seating functions, Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) group, and model, and over time. Design Convenience observational sample survey. Setting Spinal Cord Injury Model System centers. Participants Individuals with SCI (N=945) who use a PWC ≥40h/wk. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Number of required wheelchair repairs and resulting consequences (ie, being stranded, missing work/school, or missing a medical appointment). Results Rates of required repairs (47.6%–63.3%) and consequences (26.7%–40.7%) were high across manufacturers. Differences between manufacturers were found among PWCs without seating functions ( P <.001–.008) and among group 2 wheelchairs ( P =.007). Across the 10 most prescribed wheelchairs in this study, 54.5% to 73.9% of users required 1 or more repairs over a 6-month period. Increases in the number of repairs were also found for several PWC manufacturers with time. Differences were found in participant age, working status, years since injury, and presence of seating functions between manufacturers. Conclusions The differences found in the number of repairs reported by survey respondents based on PWC manufacturer and the increases in repairs over time require further evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24361786</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Absenteeism ; Adult ; Disabled Persons - statistics & numerical data ; Equipment failure ; Equipment Failure Analysis - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Reference standards ; Rehabilitation ; Sampling Studies ; Spinal cord injuries ; Spinal Cord Injuries - epidemiology ; Wheelchairs ; Wheelchairs - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2014-04, Vol.95 (4), p.597-603</ispartof><rights>American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-70319d4732ae5e610ee08208d449c0f0843b64af3922567a6f24829345e8e5283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-70319d4732ae5e610ee08208d449c0f0843b64af3922567a6f24829345e8e5283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.022$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24361786$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Worobey, Lynn, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyster, Michelle, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearlman, Jonathan, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gebrosky, Benjamin, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boninger, Michael L., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Differences Between Manufacturers in Reported Power Wheelchair Repairs and Adverse Consequences Among People With Spinal Cord Injury</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To compare the frequency of power wheelchair (PWC) repairs and consequences experienced over a 6-month period by individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) who use a PWC ≥40h/wk, based on manufacturer, seating functions, Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) group, and model, and over time. Design Convenience observational sample survey. Setting Spinal Cord Injury Model System centers. Participants Individuals with SCI (N=945) who use a PWC ≥40h/wk. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Number of required wheelchair repairs and resulting consequences (ie, being stranded, missing work/school, or missing a medical appointment). Results Rates of required repairs (47.6%–63.3%) and consequences (26.7%–40.7%) were high across manufacturers. Differences between manufacturers were found among PWCs without seating functions ( P <.001–.008) and among group 2 wheelchairs ( P =.007). Across the 10 most prescribed wheelchairs in this study, 54.5% to 73.9% of users required 1 or more repairs over a 6-month period. Increases in the number of repairs were also found for several PWC manufacturers with time. Differences were found in participant age, working status, years since injury, and presence of seating functions between manufacturers. Conclusions The differences found in the number of repairs reported by survey respondents based on PWC manufacturer and the increases in repairs over time require further evaluation.</description><subject>Absenteeism</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Disabled Persons - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Equipment failure</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Reference standards</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Sampling Studies</subject><subject>Spinal cord injuries</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - epidemiology</subject><subject>Wheelchairs</subject><subject>Wheelchairs - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EokvhD3BAPnJJ8NjOl4SQluWrUhEVBZWb5ToT1iGxg5202js_HEdbOHDgNBr5mVeeZwh5CiwHBuWLPtfTGHLOQOQAOeP8HtlAIXhWc_h2n2wYYyJrmkackEcx9qktCwEPyQmXooSqLjfk1xvbdRjQGYz0Nc63iI5-1G7ptJmXgCFS6-hnnHyYsaUX_hYDvdojDmavbVhfUolUu5Zu25vEI915F_Hncszcjt59pxfopwHplZ339HKyTg-JCi09c_0SDo_Jg04PEZ_c1VPy9d3bL7sP2fmn92e77XlmJMCcVUxA08pKcI0FlsAQWc1Z3UrZGNaxWorrUupONJwXZaXLjsuaN0IWWGPBa3FKnh9zp-DT_-KsRhsNDoN26JeooABIgUUFCeVH1AQfY8BOTcGOOhwUMLXaV71a7avVvgJQyX4aenaXv1yP2P4d-aM7AS-PAKYtbywGFY1dPbU2oJlV6-3_81_9M24G66zRww88YOz9EpLZtIeKXDF1ud5_PT8IBlwWtfgNj2Kq-w</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Worobey, Lynn, PhD</creator><creator>Oyster, Michelle, MS</creator><creator>Pearlman, Jonathan, PhD</creator><creator>Gebrosky, Benjamin, BS</creator><creator>Boninger, Michael L., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Differences Between Manufacturers in Reported Power Wheelchair Repairs and Adverse Consequences Among People With Spinal Cord Injury</title><author>Worobey, Lynn, PhD ; Oyster, Michelle, MS ; Pearlman, Jonathan, PhD ; Gebrosky, Benjamin, BS ; Boninger, Michael L., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-70319d4732ae5e610ee08208d449c0f0843b64af3922567a6f24829345e8e5283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Absenteeism</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Disabled Persons - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Equipment failure</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Reference standards</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Sampling Studies</topic><topic>Spinal cord injuries</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - epidemiology</topic><topic>Wheelchairs</topic><topic>Wheelchairs - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Worobey, Lynn, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyster, Michelle, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearlman, Jonathan, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gebrosky, Benjamin, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boninger, Michael L., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Worobey, Lynn, PhD</au><au>Oyster, Michelle, MS</au><au>Pearlman, Jonathan, PhD</au><au>Gebrosky, Benjamin, BS</au><au>Boninger, Michael L., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences Between Manufacturers in Reported Power Wheelchair Repairs and Adverse Consequences Among People With Spinal Cord Injury</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>597</spage><epage>603</epage><pages>597-603</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To compare the frequency of power wheelchair (PWC) repairs and consequences experienced over a 6-month period by individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) who use a PWC ≥40h/wk, based on manufacturer, seating functions, Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) group, and model, and over time. Design Convenience observational sample survey. Setting Spinal Cord Injury Model System centers. Participants Individuals with SCI (N=945) who use a PWC ≥40h/wk. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Number of required wheelchair repairs and resulting consequences (ie, being stranded, missing work/school, or missing a medical appointment). Results Rates of required repairs (47.6%–63.3%) and consequences (26.7%–40.7%) were high across manufacturers. Differences between manufacturers were found among PWCs without seating functions ( P <.001–.008) and among group 2 wheelchairs ( P =.007). Across the 10 most prescribed wheelchairs in this study, 54.5% to 73.9% of users required 1 or more repairs over a 6-month period. Increases in the number of repairs were also found for several PWC manufacturers with time. Differences were found in participant age, working status, years since injury, and presence of seating functions between manufacturers. Conclusions The differences found in the number of repairs reported by survey respondents based on PWC manufacturer and the increases in repairs over time require further evaluation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24361786</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.022</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-9993 |
| ispartof | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2014-04, Vol.95 (4), p.597-603 |
| issn | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1511820571 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Absenteeism Adult Disabled Persons - statistics & numerical data Equipment failure Equipment Failure Analysis - statistics & numerical data Female Humans Male Middle Aged Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reference standards Rehabilitation Sampling Studies Spinal cord injuries Spinal Cord Injuries - epidemiology Wheelchairs Wheelchairs - statistics & numerical data |
| title | Differences Between Manufacturers in Reported Power Wheelchair Repairs and Adverse Consequences Among People With Spinal Cord Injury |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A48%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20Between%20Manufacturers%20in%20Reported%20Power%20Wheelchair%20Repairs%20and%20Adverse%20Consequences%20Among%20People%20With%20Spinal%20Cord%20Injury&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Worobey,%20Lynn,%20PhD&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=597&rft.epage=603&rft.pages=597-603&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1511820571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1511820571&rft_id=info:pmid/24361786&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0003999313012458&rfr_iscdi=true |