Differences Between Manufacturers in Reported Power Wheelchair Repairs and Adverse Consequences Among People With Spinal Cord Injury

Abstract Objective To compare the frequency of power wheelchair (PWC) repairs and consequences experienced over a 6-month period by individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) who use a PWC ≥40h/wk, based on manufacturer, seating functions, Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) group, and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2014-04, Vol.95 (4), p.597-603
Hauptverfasser: Worobey, Lynn, PhD, Oyster, Michelle, MS, Pearlman, Jonathan, PhD, Gebrosky, Benjamin, BS, Boninger, Michael L., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective To compare the frequency of power wheelchair (PWC) repairs and consequences experienced over a 6-month period by individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) who use a PWC ≥40h/wk, based on manufacturer, seating functions, Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) group, and model, and over time. Design Convenience observational sample survey. Setting Spinal Cord Injury Model System centers. Participants Individuals with SCI (N=945) who use a PWC ≥40h/wk. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Number of required wheelchair repairs and resulting consequences (ie, being stranded, missing work/school, or missing a medical appointment). Results Rates of required repairs (47.6%–63.3%) and consequences (26.7%–40.7%) were high across manufacturers. Differences between manufacturers were found among PWCs without seating functions ( P
ISSN:0003-9993
1532-821X
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.022