Prognostic impact of diagnosing colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma using the World Health Organization 2010 classification
Background Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) arising in the large intestine are rare neoplasms with highly aggressive behavior. The aim of the study was to compare the 2000 and 2010 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of these colorectal NECs. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgery 2014-04, Vol.155 (4), p.650-658 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) arising in the large intestine are rare neoplasms with highly aggressive behavior. The aim of the study was to compare the 2000 and 2010 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of these colorectal NECs. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with colorectal NECs according to the WHO 2000 classification who underwent surgery at the Asan Medical Center between May 2000 and December 2010. The data were reevaluated to assess their consistency with the WHO 2010 classification. Results For 20 of the 34 patients (59%), the 2000 and 2010 WHO classifications yielded the same NEC diagnosis (NEC group), whereas for 14 of the 34 patients (41%), the WHO 2010 classification mandated a diagnosis of G1 or G2 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) rather than NECs (G1/G2 NET group). The NEC group was older than the G1/G2 NET group (64 vs 55 years; P = .05). Tumor differentiation in the NEC group was poorer than in the G1/G2 NET group (percentage of poorly differentiated tumor, 70% vs 7%; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0039-6060 1532-7361 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.surg.2013.11.012 |