A review of the contemporary evidence on rescue cervical cerclage

Abstract Background Rescue cervical cerclage (RCC) is essentially a salvage procedure to prolong pregnancy in women with advanced cervical changes and prolapsed membranes in the second trimester. However, its effectiveness and safety remain controversial. Objectives To provide a comprehensive review...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2014-03, Vol.124 (3), p.198-203
Hauptverfasser: Abu Hashim, Hatem, Al-Inany, Hesham, Kilani, Zaid
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Rescue cervical cerclage (RCC) is essentially a salvage procedure to prolong pregnancy in women with advanced cervical changes and prolapsed membranes in the second trimester. However, its effectiveness and safety remain controversial. Objectives To provide a comprehensive review of the contemporary evidence on RCC and evaluate which treatment modalities can be offered to pregnant women based on the best available evidence. Search strategy A PubMed search of published studies on RCC and perinatal outcome was conducted using defined keywords. Selection criteria Clinical studies were included with priority for level I evidence (randomized controlled trials [RCTs]) followed by other evidence levels. Data collection and analysis Abstracts of 141 articles were screened and 40 articles were selected. Main results Evidence from retrospective and nonrandomized prospective trials shows a benefit of RCC. It may prolong pregnancy by an average of 4–5 weeks, with a 2-fold reduction in the chance of preterm birth before 34 weeks. A higher chance of failure is expected if cervical dilatation exceeds 4 cm or if membranes are bulging into the vagina. Conclusions The decision for an RCC should be individualized after comprehensive counseling by a senior obstetrician. Further research in the form of robust RCTs is recommended.
ISSN:0020-7292
1879-3479
DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.08.021