Cost study of dermal substitutes and topical negative pressure in the surgical treatment of burns

Abstract Background A recently performed randomised controlled trial investigated the clinical effectiveness of dermal substitutes (DS) and split skin grafts (SSG) in combination with topical negative pressure (TNP) in the surgical treatment of burn wounds. In the current study, medical and non-medi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Burns 2014-05, Vol.40 (3), p.388-396
Hauptverfasser: Hop, M. Jenda, Bloemen, Monica C.T, van Baar, Margriet E, Nieuwenhuis, Marianne K, van Zuijlen, Paul P.M, Polinder, Suzanne, Middelkoop, Esther
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background A recently performed randomised controlled trial investigated the clinical effectiveness of dermal substitutes (DS) and split skin grafts (SSG) in combination with topical negative pressure (TNP) in the surgical treatment of burn wounds. In the current study, medical and non-medical costs were investigated, to comprehensively assess the benefits of this new treatment. Methods The primary outcome was mean total costs of the four treatment strategies: SSG with or without DS, and with or without TNP. Costs were studied from a societal perspective. Findings were evaluated in light of the clinical effects on scar elasticity. Results Eighty-six patients were included. Twelve months post-operatively, highest elasticity was measured in scars treated with DS and TNP ( p = 0.027). The initial cost price of treatment with DS and TNP was €2912 compared to treatment with SSG alone €1703 ( p < 0.001). However, mean total costs per patient did not differ significantly between groups (range €29 097–€43 774). Discussion Costs of the interventional treatment contributed maximal 7% to the total costs and total costs varied widely within and between groups, but were not significantly different. Therefore, in the selection of the most optimal type of surgical intervention, cost considerations should not play an important role.
ISSN:0305-4179
1879-1409
DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2013.08.025