Feasibility of left ventricular volume measurements by three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography depends on image quality and degree of left ventricular enlargement: Validation study with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract Background Novel 3-dimensional echocardiography with speckle tracking imaging (3D-STE) may have advantages in assessing left ventricular (LV) volume through a cardiac cycle. The feasibility of 3D-STE may be affected by image quality and LV morphology. Methods and results We studied 64 patie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiology 2014-03, Vol.63 (3), p.230-238
Hauptverfasser: Kawamura, Ryo, MD, Seo, Yoshihiro, MD, PhD, FJCC, Ishizu, Tomoko, MD, PhD, FJCC, Atsumi, Akiko, MD, Yamamoto, Masayoshi, MD, Machino-Ohtsuka, Tomoko, MD, Nakajima, Hideki, PhD, Sakai, Satoshi, MD, PhD, Tanaka, Yumiko Oishi, MD, PhD, Minami, Manabu, MD, PhD, Aonuma, Kazutaka, MD, PhD, FJCC
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Novel 3-dimensional echocardiography with speckle tracking imaging (3D-STE) may have advantages in assessing left ventricular (LV) volume through a cardiac cycle. The feasibility of 3D-STE may be affected by image quality and LV morphology. Methods and results We studied 64 patients (38 men, age 55 ± 12 years) who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) and 3D-STE on the same day. LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV) were measured by both modalities. Imaging qualities were quantified in each of 6 LV segments by an imaging quality score (IQS) of 1–3, and scores were averaged (mean IQS) at end-diastole and end-systole. Compared to CMRI, 3D-STE showed a tendency to underestimate LV volume measurements, but not significantly (EDV: bias = −18 ± 37 ml; ESV: bias = −10 ± 34 ml), and measurements correlated well with those by CMRI (EDV: R = 0.80, ESV: R = 0.86, ejection fraction: R = 0.75, p < 0.001). The absolute differences of LVEDV and ESV between 3D-STE and CMRI correlated significantly with mean IQS (LVEDV, R = −0.35, p = 0.005; LVESV, R = −0.30, p = 0.02). Based on the medium value of LVEDV by CMRI (127 ml), subjects were classified into the small (
ISSN:0914-5087
1876-4738
DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.08.010