In vitro measures of membrane changes reveal differences between red blood cells stored in saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol and AS-1 additive solutions: a paired study

Background Saline‐adenine‐glucose‐mannitol (SAGM) and a variant solution, AS‐1, have been used for more than 30 years to preserve red blood cells (RBCs). Reputedly these RBC components have similar quality, although no paired study has been reported. To determine whether differences exist, a paired...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) Pa.), 2014-03, Vol.54 (3), p.560-568
Hauptverfasser: Sparrow, Rosemary L., Sran, Amrita, Healey, Geraldine, Veale, Margaret F., Norris, Philip J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 568
container_issue 3
container_start_page 560
container_title Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)
container_volume 54
creator Sparrow, Rosemary L.
Sran, Amrita
Healey, Geraldine
Veale, Margaret F.
Norris, Philip J.
description Background Saline‐adenine‐glucose‐mannitol (SAGM) and a variant solution, AS‐1, have been used for more than 30 years to preserve red blood cells (RBCs). Reputedly these RBC components have similar quality, although no paired study has been reported. To determine whether differences exist, a paired study of SAGM RBCs and AS‐1 RBCs was conducted to identify membrane changes, including microparticle (MP) quantitation and in vitro RBC–endothelial cell (EC) interaction. Study Design and Methods Two whole blood packs were pooled and split and RBCs were prepared (n = 6 pairs). One pack was suspended in SAGM and one in AS‐1. Samples were collected during 42 days of refrigerated storage. RBC shape and size and glycophorin A (GPA)+ and phosphatidylserine (PS)+ MPs were measured by flow cytometry. RBC adhesion to ECs was determined by an in vitro flow perfusion assay. Routine variables (pH, hemolysis) were also measured. Results Compared to SAGM RBCs, AS‐1 RBCs had lower hemolysis (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/trf.12344
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1507189337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3242132281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3714-755e3aa289be3caf74a880fd9ae20986260953b8ed30ab7ec240fa910fe0f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxiMEokvhwAsgSwgJDmntOI5jblWhf6QKJLoSR2uSjIuL117sZMu-EM-Jw26LhIQvY41_882Mv6J4yegRy-d4jOaIVbyuHxULJrgsK6XE42JBac1Kxnh1UDxL6ZZSWinKnhYHFW8b1dBqUfy69GRjxxjICiFNERMJJt9XXQSPpP8G_ibnIm4QHBmsMRjR9znV4XiH6PPTQDoXwkB6dC6RNIY5ZT1J4KzHEgb0c7xxUx8Slivw3o7BEfADObkuGYFhsKPdIEnBTaMNPr0nQNZgZ6E0TsP2efHEgEv4Yh8Pi-uzj8vTi_Lq8_nl6clV2XPJ6lIKgRygalWHvAcja2hbagYFWFHVNlVDleBdiwOn0Ensq5oaUIwapEbww-LtTnUdw48J06hXNs1b5a8IU9JMUMlaxbnM6Ot_0NswRZ9nmylRt5VseKbe7ag-hpQiGr2OdgVxqxnVs3U6W6f_WJfZV3vFqVvh8EDee5WBN3sAUg_OZIN6m_5yLVei4fMWxzvuzjrc_r-jXn45u29d7ipsGvHnQwXE77qRXAr99dO5vhD8Q8OXtZb8N9NXwKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1505482763</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vitro measures of membrane changes reveal differences between red blood cells stored in saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol and AS-1 additive solutions: a paired study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Sparrow, Rosemary L. ; Sran, Amrita ; Healey, Geraldine ; Veale, Margaret F. ; Norris, Philip J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sparrow, Rosemary L. ; Sran, Amrita ; Healey, Geraldine ; Veale, Margaret F. ; Norris, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Saline‐adenine‐glucose‐mannitol (SAGM) and a variant solution, AS‐1, have been used for more than 30 years to preserve red blood cells (RBCs). Reputedly these RBC components have similar quality, although no paired study has been reported. To determine whether differences exist, a paired study of SAGM RBCs and AS‐1 RBCs was conducted to identify membrane changes, including microparticle (MP) quantitation and in vitro RBC–endothelial cell (EC) interaction. Study Design and Methods Two whole blood packs were pooled and split and RBCs were prepared (n = 6 pairs). One pack was suspended in SAGM and one in AS‐1. Samples were collected during 42 days of refrigerated storage. RBC shape and size and glycophorin A (GPA)+ and phosphatidylserine (PS)+ MPs were measured by flow cytometry. RBC adhesion to ECs was determined by an in vitro flow perfusion assay. Routine variables (pH, hemolysis) were also measured. Results Compared to SAGM RBCs, AS‐1 RBCs had lower hemolysis (p &lt; 0.04), lower GPA+ MPs (p &lt; 0.03), and lower PS+ MPs (p &lt; 0.03) from Day 14 onward. AS‐1 RBCs had higher (p &lt; 0.02) side scatter from Day 28 onward compared to SAGM RBCs. SAGM RBCs were more adherent to ECs on Day 28 of storage compared to AS‐1 RBCs (p = 0.04), but reversed on Day 42 (p = 0.02). Conclusion SAGM RBCs lose more membrane during storage. SAGM RBCs had increased adherence to ECs on Day 28 of storage, while AS‐1 RBCs were more adherent on Day 42. The effect of these differences on the function and survival of SAGM RBCs and AS‐1 RBCs after transfusion remains to be determined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1132</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/trf.12344</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23869602</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRANAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adenine - pharmacology ; Adult ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood ; Blood Preservation - methods ; Blood. Blood and plasma substitutes. Blood products. Blood cells. Blood typing. Plasmapheresis. Apheresis ; Erythrocytes ; Erythrocytes - drug effects ; Flow Cytometry ; Glucose - pharmacology ; Humans ; Mannitol - pharmacology ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Transfusions. Complications. Transfusion reactions. Cell and gene therapy ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2014-03, Vol.54 (3), p.560-568</ispartof><rights>2013 Australian Red Cross. Transfusion © 2013 American Association of Blood Banks</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2013 Australian Red Cross. Transfusion © 2013 American Association of Blood Banks.</rights><rights>2014 AABB</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3714-755e3aa289be3caf74a880fd9ae20986260953b8ed30ab7ec240fa910fe0f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3714-755e3aa289be3caf74a880fd9ae20986260953b8ed30ab7ec240fa910fe0f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftrf.12344$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftrf.12344$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28395635$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23869602$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sparrow, Rosemary L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sran, Amrita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healey, Geraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veale, Margaret F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norris, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><title>In vitro measures of membrane changes reveal differences between red blood cells stored in saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol and AS-1 additive solutions: a paired study</title><title>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</title><addtitle>Transfusion</addtitle><description>Background Saline‐adenine‐glucose‐mannitol (SAGM) and a variant solution, AS‐1, have been used for more than 30 years to preserve red blood cells (RBCs). Reputedly these RBC components have similar quality, although no paired study has been reported. To determine whether differences exist, a paired study of SAGM RBCs and AS‐1 RBCs was conducted to identify membrane changes, including microparticle (MP) quantitation and in vitro RBC–endothelial cell (EC) interaction. Study Design and Methods Two whole blood packs were pooled and split and RBCs were prepared (n = 6 pairs). One pack was suspended in SAGM and one in AS‐1. Samples were collected during 42 days of refrigerated storage. RBC shape and size and glycophorin A (GPA)+ and phosphatidylserine (PS)+ MPs were measured by flow cytometry. RBC adhesion to ECs was determined by an in vitro flow perfusion assay. Routine variables (pH, hemolysis) were also measured. Results Compared to SAGM RBCs, AS‐1 RBCs had lower hemolysis (p &lt; 0.04), lower GPA+ MPs (p &lt; 0.03), and lower PS+ MPs (p &lt; 0.03) from Day 14 onward. AS‐1 RBCs had higher (p &lt; 0.02) side scatter from Day 28 onward compared to SAGM RBCs. SAGM RBCs were more adherent to ECs on Day 28 of storage compared to AS‐1 RBCs (p = 0.04), but reversed on Day 42 (p = 0.02). Conclusion SAGM RBCs lose more membrane during storage. SAGM RBCs had increased adherence to ECs on Day 28 of storage, while AS‐1 RBCs were more adherent on Day 42. The effect of these differences on the function and survival of SAGM RBCs and AS‐1 RBCs after transfusion remains to be determined.</description><subject>Adenine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood Preservation - methods</subject><subject>Blood. Blood and plasma substitutes. Blood products. Blood cells. Blood typing. Plasmapheresis. Apheresis</subject><subject>Erythrocytes</subject><subject>Erythrocytes - drug effects</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Glucose - pharmacology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mannitol - pharmacology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Transfusions. Complications. Transfusion reactions. Cell and gene therapy</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0041-1132</issn><issn>1537-2995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxiMEokvhwAsgSwgJDmntOI5jblWhf6QKJLoSR2uSjIuL117sZMu-EM-Jw26LhIQvY41_882Mv6J4yegRy-d4jOaIVbyuHxULJrgsK6XE42JBac1Kxnh1UDxL6ZZSWinKnhYHFW8b1dBqUfy69GRjxxjICiFNERMJJt9XXQSPpP8G_ibnIm4QHBmsMRjR9znV4XiH6PPTQDoXwkB6dC6RNIY5ZT1J4KzHEgb0c7xxUx8Slivw3o7BEfADObkuGYFhsKPdIEnBTaMNPr0nQNZgZ6E0TsP2efHEgEv4Yh8Pi-uzj8vTi_Lq8_nl6clV2XPJ6lIKgRygalWHvAcja2hbagYFWFHVNlVDleBdiwOn0Ensq5oaUIwapEbww-LtTnUdw48J06hXNs1b5a8IU9JMUMlaxbnM6Ot_0NswRZ9nmylRt5VseKbe7ag-hpQiGr2OdgVxqxnVs3U6W6f_WJfZV3vFqVvh8EDee5WBN3sAUg_OZIN6m_5yLVei4fMWxzvuzjrc_r-jXn45u29d7ipsGvHnQwXE77qRXAr99dO5vhD8Q8OXtZb8N9NXwKg</recordid><startdate>201403</startdate><enddate>201403</enddate><creator>Sparrow, Rosemary L.</creator><creator>Sran, Amrita</creator><creator>Healey, Geraldine</creator><creator>Veale, Margaret F.</creator><creator>Norris, Philip J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201403</creationdate><title>In vitro measures of membrane changes reveal differences between red blood cells stored in saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol and AS-1 additive solutions: a paired study</title><author>Sparrow, Rosemary L. ; Sran, Amrita ; Healey, Geraldine ; Veale, Margaret F. ; Norris, Philip J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3714-755e3aa289be3caf74a880fd9ae20986260953b8ed30ab7ec240fa910fe0f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adenine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood Preservation - methods</topic><topic>Blood. Blood and plasma substitutes. Blood products. Blood cells. Blood typing. Plasmapheresis. Apheresis</topic><topic>Erythrocytes</topic><topic>Erythrocytes - drug effects</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Glucose - pharmacology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mannitol - pharmacology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Transfusions. Complications. Transfusion reactions. Cell and gene therapy</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sparrow, Rosemary L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sran, Amrita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healey, Geraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veale, Margaret F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norris, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sparrow, Rosemary L.</au><au>Sran, Amrita</au><au>Healey, Geraldine</au><au>Veale, Margaret F.</au><au>Norris, Philip J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vitro measures of membrane changes reveal differences between red blood cells stored in saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol and AS-1 additive solutions: a paired study</atitle><jtitle>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle><addtitle>Transfusion</addtitle><date>2014-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>560</spage><epage>568</epage><pages>560-568</pages><issn>0041-1132</issn><eissn>1537-2995</eissn><coden>TRANAT</coden><abstract>Background Saline‐adenine‐glucose‐mannitol (SAGM) and a variant solution, AS‐1, have been used for more than 30 years to preserve red blood cells (RBCs). Reputedly these RBC components have similar quality, although no paired study has been reported. To determine whether differences exist, a paired study of SAGM RBCs and AS‐1 RBCs was conducted to identify membrane changes, including microparticle (MP) quantitation and in vitro RBC–endothelial cell (EC) interaction. Study Design and Methods Two whole blood packs were pooled and split and RBCs were prepared (n = 6 pairs). One pack was suspended in SAGM and one in AS‐1. Samples were collected during 42 days of refrigerated storage. RBC shape and size and glycophorin A (GPA)+ and phosphatidylserine (PS)+ MPs were measured by flow cytometry. RBC adhesion to ECs was determined by an in vitro flow perfusion assay. Routine variables (pH, hemolysis) were also measured. Results Compared to SAGM RBCs, AS‐1 RBCs had lower hemolysis (p &lt; 0.04), lower GPA+ MPs (p &lt; 0.03), and lower PS+ MPs (p &lt; 0.03) from Day 14 onward. AS‐1 RBCs had higher (p &lt; 0.02) side scatter from Day 28 onward compared to SAGM RBCs. SAGM RBCs were more adherent to ECs on Day 28 of storage compared to AS‐1 RBCs (p = 0.04), but reversed on Day 42 (p = 0.02). Conclusion SAGM RBCs lose more membrane during storage. SAGM RBCs had increased adherence to ECs on Day 28 of storage, while AS‐1 RBCs were more adherent on Day 42. The effect of these differences on the function and survival of SAGM RBCs and AS‐1 RBCs after transfusion remains to be determined.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23869602</pmid><doi>10.1111/trf.12344</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1132
ispartof Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2014-03, Vol.54 (3), p.560-568
issn 0041-1132
1537-2995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1507189337
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects Adenine - pharmacology
Adult
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Blood
Blood Preservation - methods
Blood. Blood and plasma substitutes. Blood products. Blood cells. Blood typing. Plasmapheresis. Apheresis
Erythrocytes
Erythrocytes - drug effects
Flow Cytometry
Glucose - pharmacology
Humans
Mannitol - pharmacology
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Transfusions. Complications. Transfusion reactions. Cell and gene therapy
Young Adult
title In vitro measures of membrane changes reveal differences between red blood cells stored in saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol and AS-1 additive solutions: a paired study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T04%3A45%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vitro%20measures%20of%20membrane%20changes%20reveal%20differences%20between%20red%20blood%20cells%20stored%20in%20saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol%20and%20AS-1%20additive%20solutions:%20a%20paired%20study&rft.jtitle=Transfusion%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.)&rft.au=Sparrow,%20Rosemary%20L.&rft.date=2014-03&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=560&rft.epage=568&rft.pages=560-568&rft.issn=0041-1132&rft.eissn=1537-2995&rft.coden=TRANAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/trf.12344&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3242132281%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1505482763&rft_id=info:pmid/23869602&rfr_iscdi=true