Prioritization strategies for patient evacuations
Evacuation from a health care facility is considered last resort, and in the event of a complete evacuation, a standard planning assumption is that all patients will be evacuated. A literature review of the suggested prioritization strategies for evacuation planning—as well as the transportation pri...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health care management science 2014-03, Vol.17 (1), p.77-87 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Evacuation from a health care facility is considered last resort, and in the event of a complete evacuation, a standard planning assumption is that all patients will be evacuated. A literature review of the suggested prioritization strategies for evacuation planning—as well as the transportation priorities used in actual facility evacuations—shows a lack of consensus about whether critical or non-critical care patients should be transferred first. In addition, it is implied that these policies are “greedy” in that one patient group is given priority, and patients from that group are chosen to be completely evacuated before any patients are evacuated from the other group. The purpose of this paper is to present a dynamic programming model for emergency patient evacuations and show that a greedy, “all-or-nothing” policy is not always optimal as well as discuss insights of the resulting optimal prioritization strategies for unit- or floor-level evacuations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1386-9620 1572-9389 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10729-013-9236-0 |