Tree indiscernibilities, revisited
We give definitions that distinguish between two notions of indiscernibility for a set { a η ∣ η ∈ ω > ω } that saw original use in Shelah [Classification theory and the number of non-isomorphic models (revised edition). North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990 ], which we name s - and str − indiscernibili...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archive for mathematical logic 2014-02, Vol.53 (1-2), p.211-232 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We give definitions that distinguish between two notions of indiscernibility for a set
{
a
η
∣
η
∈
ω
>
ω
}
that saw original use in Shelah [Classification theory and the number of non-isomorphic models (revised edition). North-Holland, Amsterdam,
1990
], which we name
s
- and
str
−
indiscernibility
. Using these definitions and detailed proofs, we prove s- and str-modeling theorems and give applications of these theorems. In particular, we verify a step in the argument that TP is equivalent to TP
1
or TP
2
that has not seen explication in the literature. In the Appendix, we exposit the proofs of Shelah [Classification theory and the number of non-isomorphic models (revised edition). North-Holland, Amsterdam,
1990
, App. 2.6, 2.7], expanding on the details. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0933-5846 1432-0665 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00153-013-0363-6 |