Tree indiscernibilities, revisited

We give definitions that distinguish between two notions of indiscernibility for a set { a η ∣ η ∈ ω > ω } that saw original use in Shelah [Classification theory and the number of non-isomorphic models (revised edition). North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990 ], which we name s - and str − indiscernibili...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archive for mathematical logic 2014-02, Vol.53 (1-2), p.211-232
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Byunghan, Kim, Hyeung-Joon, Scow, Lynn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We give definitions that distinguish between two notions of indiscernibility for a set { a η ∣ η ∈ ω > ω } that saw original use in Shelah [Classification theory and the number of non-isomorphic models (revised edition). North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990 ], which we name s - and str − indiscernibility . Using these definitions and detailed proofs, we prove s- and str-modeling theorems and give applications of these theorems. In particular, we verify a step in the argument that TP is equivalent to TP 1 or TP 2 that has not seen explication in the literature. In the Appendix, we exposit the proofs of Shelah [Classification theory and the number of non-isomorphic models (revised edition). North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990 , App. 2.6, 2.7], expanding on the details.
ISSN:0933-5846
1432-0665
DOI:10.1007/s00153-013-0363-6