Replication Dynamics: Biases and Robustness of DNA Fiber Analysis

The factors that govern replication programs are still poorly identified in metazoans, especially in mammalian cells. Thanks to molecular combing, the dynamics of DNA replication can be assessed at the genome-scale level from the cumulative analysis of single DNA fibers. This technique notably enabl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of molecular biology 2013-11, Vol.425 (23), p.4845-4855
Hauptverfasser: Técher, Hervé, Koundrioukoff, Stéphane, Azar, Dana, Wilhelm, Therese, Carignon, Sandra, Brison, Olivier, Debatisse, Michelle, Le Tallec, Benoît
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The factors that govern replication programs are still poorly identified in metazoans, especially in mammalian cells. Thanks to molecular combing, the dynamics of DNA replication can be assessed at the genome-scale level from the cumulative analysis of single DNA fibers. This technique notably enables measurement of replication fork speed and fork asymmetry and that of distances separating either initiation or termination events. The results presented here aim to evaluate requirements critical to accurate measurement of replication parameters by molecular combing. We show that sample size, fiber length and DNA counterstaining are crucial to gain robust information concerning replication dynamics. Our results thus provide a methodological frame to investigate the DNA replication program through molecular combing analyses. [Display omitted] ► Fork speed is subjected to 10–15% of experimental variability. ► Sample size impact on fork speed and IOD measurement. ► Fiber length impact on measured fork speed, IOD and fork asymmetry. ► Thirty percent of fibers are broken at the level of replication signals. ► DNA counterstaining is required to assess replication parameters.
ISSN:0022-2836
1089-8638
DOI:10.1016/j.jmb.2013.03.040