Solution-side effectiveness for a liquid-to-air membrane energy exchanger used as a dehumidifier/regenerator
•Liquid-to-air membrane energy exchangers are called LAMEEs in this paper.•For the first time, the solution-side (SS) effectiveness are introduced for LAMEEs.•The SS effectiveness is very important when a LAMEE is used as a regenerator.•Both the air-side and solution-side effectiveness of the LAMEE...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied energy 2014-01, Vol.113, p.872-882 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Liquid-to-air membrane energy exchangers are called LAMEEs in this paper.•For the first time, the solution-side (SS) effectiveness are introduced for LAMEEs.•The SS effectiveness is very important when a LAMEE is used as a regenerator.•Both the air-side and solution-side effectiveness of the LAMEE increase with Cr∗.•The air-side and solution-side effectiveness values are different in most cases.
A liquid-to-air membrane energy exchanger (LAMEE) is an energy exchange device that transfers heat and moisture between air and salt solution streams through a semi-permeable membrane which is permeable for water vapor but impermeable for liquid water. LAMEEs have been used as a dehumidifier/regenerator in air-conditioning systems. In this paper, the solution-side effectiveness are presented for a small-scale single-panel LAMEE when it is used to regenerate the solution flow. The solution-side effectiveness are very important in regenerators where the main focus is on the salt solution, and the solution properties (i.e. solution outlet concentration) are important. The small-scale LAMEE is tested under air dehumidification and solution regeneration test conditions using a LiCl solution at one NTU (i.e. NTU=5) and three different Cr∗ values (Cr∗=2, 4 and 6). The results show that both the air-side and solution-side effectiveness of the LAMEE increase with Cr∗. The solution-side latent effectiveness is lower for the regenerator in comparison to the dehumidifier (e.g. 43% lower at Cr∗=6). Also, the numerical results for a small-scale LAMEE which were presented in literature are used in this paper to evaluate the solution-side effectiveness of the LAMEE under different test conditions. The numerical results show that the difference between the air-side and solution-side latent effectiveness are negligible. Therefore, the air-side latent effectiveness can be used to evaluate the solution-side latent effectiveness of LAMEEs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0306-2619 1872-9118 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.037 |