Comparison of two commercial vaccines against visceral leishmaniasis in dogs from endemic areas: IgG, and subclasses, parasitism, and parasite transmission by xenodiagnosis

Highlights • Two commercial vaccines against canine visceral leishmaniasis were compared. • The outcome of vaccination of pet dogs was evaluated in endemic natural conditions. • A controlled prospective clinical approach was used to monitor the vaccinated dogs. • Post-vaccinal xenodiagnosis, serolog...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vaccine 2014-03, Vol.32 (11), p.1287-1295
Hauptverfasser: Fernandes, Consuelo Barreto, Junior, Jairo Torres Magalhães, de Jesus, Clauceane, Souza, Bárbara Maria Paraná da Silva, Larangeira, Daniela Farias, Fraga, Deborah Bittencourt Mothé, Tavares Veras, Patricia Sampaio, Barrouin-Melo, Stella Maria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1295
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1287
container_title Vaccine
container_volume 32
creator Fernandes, Consuelo Barreto
Junior, Jairo Torres Magalhães
de Jesus, Clauceane
Souza, Bárbara Maria Paraná da Silva
Larangeira, Daniela Farias
Fraga, Deborah Bittencourt Mothé
Tavares Veras, Patricia Sampaio
Barrouin-Melo, Stella Maria
description Highlights • Two commercial vaccines against canine visceral leishmaniasis were compared. • The outcome of vaccination of pet dogs was evaluated in endemic natural conditions. • A controlled prospective clinical approach was used to monitor the vaccinated dogs. • Post-vaccinal xenodiagnosis, serology, parasitology, and clinical data were similar. • Reactogenicity and IgG subclass profile resulted in main differences among vaccines.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.12.046
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1505342352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0264410X13017891</els_id><sourcerecordid>3220371631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-562d74c7922e6b7ece09dd4ff10d46772f46de1f9f26acb5a634aaf97a07cec83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks-O0zAQxiMEYsvCI4AsISQO22I7jpNwAKEKlpVW4gBI3KypPSkuiV08aaHvxEPiqIWV9gIny5rf_Pnmm6J4LPhCcKFfbBZ7sNYHXEguyoWQC670nWImmrqcy0o0d4sZl1rNleBfzooHRBvOeVWK9n5xJpXiumzlrPi1jMMWkqcYWOzY-CMyG4cBk_XQs1MLYrAGH2hke08WU4706OnrAMEDeWI-MBfXxLoUB4bB4eAtg4RAL9nV-vKCQXCMdivbAxHSBcstc-LoaTjGTn9kY4JAgyfyeaDVgf3EEJ2HdYi5z8PiXgc94aPTe158fvf20_L9_PrD5dXyzfXcVlUzzistXa1s3UqJelWjRd46p7pOcKd0XctOaYeiazupwa4q0KUC6NoaeG3RNuV58fxYd5vi9x3SaIZJd99DwLgjI6q8SCXLSv4PynUrKqky-vQWuom7FLIQI1TbKCWVKDNVHSmbIlHCzmyTHyAdjOBmct5szMkWMzlvhDTZ-Zz35FR9txrQ_c36Y3UGnp0AIAt9lxdtPd1wjawrXU7iXx85zBvee0yGrMdg0fmEdjQu-n-O8upWBdv74HPTb3hAulFtKCeYj9OZTlcqSi7qphXlb1Pl5u4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1498442413</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of two commercial vaccines against visceral leishmaniasis in dogs from endemic areas: IgG, and subclasses, parasitism, and parasite transmission by xenodiagnosis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Fernandes, Consuelo Barreto ; Junior, Jairo Torres Magalhães ; de Jesus, Clauceane ; Souza, Bárbara Maria Paraná da Silva ; Larangeira, Daniela Farias ; Fraga, Deborah Bittencourt Mothé ; Tavares Veras, Patricia Sampaio ; Barrouin-Melo, Stella Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Consuelo Barreto ; Junior, Jairo Torres Magalhães ; de Jesus, Clauceane ; Souza, Bárbara Maria Paraná da Silva ; Larangeira, Daniela Farias ; Fraga, Deborah Bittencourt Mothé ; Tavares Veras, Patricia Sampaio ; Barrouin-Melo, Stella Maria</creatorcontrib><description>Highlights • Two commercial vaccines against canine visceral leishmaniasis were compared. • The outcome of vaccination of pet dogs was evaluated in endemic natural conditions. • A controlled prospective clinical approach was used to monitor the vaccinated dogs. • Post-vaccinal xenodiagnosis, serology, parasitology, and clinical data were similar. • Reactogenicity and IgG subclass profile resulted in main differences among vaccines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.12.046</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24406392</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VACCDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Allergy and Immunology ; Animals ; Antibodies, Protozoan - blood ; Applied microbiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brazil ; Canine immunization ; Dog Diseases - parasitology ; Dog Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; Dogs ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human protozoal diseases ; Immunity, Humoral ; Immunoglobulin G - blood ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Leishmania infantum ; Leishmaniasis Vaccines - adverse effects ; Leishmaniasis Vaccines - therapeutic use ; Leishmaniasis, Visceral - diagnosis ; Leishmaniasis, Visceral - prevention &amp; control ; Leishmaniasis, Visceral - veterinary ; Leishmune® and Leish-Tec ; Leshmaniasis ; Lutzomyia longipalpis ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Microbiology ; Parasites ; Parasitic diseases ; Parasitism ; Prospective Studies ; Protozoal diseases ; Reactogenicity ; Side effects ; Vaccination - veterinary ; Vaccines ; Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects) ; Vector-borne diseases ; Xenodiagnosis</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2014-03, Vol.32 (11), p.1287-1295</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Mar 5, 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-562d74c7922e6b7ece09dd4ff10d46772f46de1f9f26acb5a634aaf97a07cec83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-562d74c7922e6b7ece09dd4ff10d46772f46de1f9f26acb5a634aaf97a07cec83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1498442413?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993,64383,64385,64387,72239</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28275638$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24406392$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Consuelo Barreto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junior, Jairo Torres Magalhães</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jesus, Clauceane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Bárbara Maria Paraná da Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larangeira, Daniela Farias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraga, Deborah Bittencourt Mothé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavares Veras, Patricia Sampaio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrouin-Melo, Stella Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of two commercial vaccines against visceral leishmaniasis in dogs from endemic areas: IgG, and subclasses, parasitism, and parasite transmission by xenodiagnosis</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Highlights • Two commercial vaccines against canine visceral leishmaniasis were compared. • The outcome of vaccination of pet dogs was evaluated in endemic natural conditions. • A controlled prospective clinical approach was used to monitor the vaccinated dogs. • Post-vaccinal xenodiagnosis, serology, parasitology, and clinical data were similar. • Reactogenicity and IgG subclass profile resulted in main differences among vaccines.</description><subject>Allergy and Immunology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies, Protozoan - blood</subject><subject>Applied microbiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Canine immunization</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - parasitology</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human protozoal diseases</subject><subject>Immunity, Humoral</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G - blood</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Leishmania infantum</subject><subject>Leishmaniasis Vaccines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Leishmaniasis Vaccines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Leishmaniasis, Visceral - diagnosis</subject><subject>Leishmaniasis, Visceral - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Leishmaniasis, Visceral - veterinary</subject><subject>Leishmune® and Leish-Tec</subject><subject>Leshmaniasis</subject><subject>Lutzomyia longipalpis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Parasitic diseases</subject><subject>Parasitism</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Protozoal diseases</subject><subject>Reactogenicity</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Vaccination - veterinary</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects)</subject><subject>Vector-borne diseases</subject><subject>Xenodiagnosis</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks-O0zAQxiMEYsvCI4AsISQO22I7jpNwAKEKlpVW4gBI3KypPSkuiV08aaHvxEPiqIWV9gIny5rf_Pnmm6J4LPhCcKFfbBZ7sNYHXEguyoWQC670nWImmrqcy0o0d4sZl1rNleBfzooHRBvOeVWK9n5xJpXiumzlrPi1jMMWkqcYWOzY-CMyG4cBk_XQs1MLYrAGH2hke08WU4706OnrAMEDeWI-MBfXxLoUB4bB4eAtg4RAL9nV-vKCQXCMdivbAxHSBcstc-LoaTjGTn9kY4JAgyfyeaDVgf3EEJ2HdYi5z8PiXgc94aPTe158fvf20_L9_PrD5dXyzfXcVlUzzistXa1s3UqJelWjRd46p7pOcKd0XctOaYeiazupwa4q0KUC6NoaeG3RNuV58fxYd5vi9x3SaIZJd99DwLgjI6q8SCXLSv4PynUrKqky-vQWuom7FLIQI1TbKCWVKDNVHSmbIlHCzmyTHyAdjOBmct5szMkWMzlvhDTZ-Zz35FR9txrQ_c36Y3UGnp0AIAt9lxdtPd1wjawrXU7iXx85zBvee0yGrMdg0fmEdjQu-n-O8upWBdv74HPTb3hAulFtKCeYj9OZTlcqSi7qphXlb1Pl5u4</recordid><startdate>20140305</startdate><enddate>20140305</enddate><creator>Fernandes, Consuelo Barreto</creator><creator>Junior, Jairo Torres Magalhães</creator><creator>de Jesus, Clauceane</creator><creator>Souza, Bárbara Maria Paraná da Silva</creator><creator>Larangeira, Daniela Farias</creator><creator>Fraga, Deborah Bittencourt Mothé</creator><creator>Tavares Veras, Patricia Sampaio</creator><creator>Barrouin-Melo, Stella Maria</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140305</creationdate><title>Comparison of two commercial vaccines against visceral leishmaniasis in dogs from endemic areas: IgG, and subclasses, parasitism, and parasite transmission by xenodiagnosis</title><author>Fernandes, Consuelo Barreto ; Junior, Jairo Torres Magalhães ; de Jesus, Clauceane ; Souza, Bárbara Maria Paraná da Silva ; Larangeira, Daniela Farias ; Fraga, Deborah Bittencourt Mothé ; Tavares Veras, Patricia Sampaio ; Barrouin-Melo, Stella Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-562d74c7922e6b7ece09dd4ff10d46772f46de1f9f26acb5a634aaf97a07cec83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Allergy and Immunology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies, Protozoan - blood</topic><topic>Applied microbiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Canine immunization</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - parasitology</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human protozoal diseases</topic><topic>Immunity, Humoral</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G - blood</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Leishmania infantum</topic><topic>Leishmaniasis Vaccines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Leishmaniasis Vaccines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Leishmaniasis, Visceral - diagnosis</topic><topic>Leishmaniasis, Visceral - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Leishmaniasis, Visceral - veterinary</topic><topic>Leishmune® and Leish-Tec</topic><topic>Leshmaniasis</topic><topic>Lutzomyia longipalpis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Parasitic diseases</topic><topic>Parasitism</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Protozoal diseases</topic><topic>Reactogenicity</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Vaccination - veterinary</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects)</topic><topic>Vector-borne diseases</topic><topic>Xenodiagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Consuelo Barreto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junior, Jairo Torres Magalhães</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jesus, Clauceane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Bárbara Maria Paraná da Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larangeira, Daniela Farias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraga, Deborah Bittencourt Mothé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavares Veras, Patricia Sampaio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrouin-Melo, Stella Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fernandes, Consuelo Barreto</au><au>Junior, Jairo Torres Magalhães</au><au>de Jesus, Clauceane</au><au>Souza, Bárbara Maria Paraná da Silva</au><au>Larangeira, Daniela Farias</au><au>Fraga, Deborah Bittencourt Mothé</au><au>Tavares Veras, Patricia Sampaio</au><au>Barrouin-Melo, Stella Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of two commercial vaccines against visceral leishmaniasis in dogs from endemic areas: IgG, and subclasses, parasitism, and parasite transmission by xenodiagnosis</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2014-03-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1287</spage><epage>1295</epage><pages>1287-1295</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><coden>VACCDE</coden><abstract>Highlights • Two commercial vaccines against canine visceral leishmaniasis were compared. • The outcome of vaccination of pet dogs was evaluated in endemic natural conditions. • A controlled prospective clinical approach was used to monitor the vaccinated dogs. • Post-vaccinal xenodiagnosis, serology, parasitology, and clinical data were similar. • Reactogenicity and IgG subclass profile resulted in main differences among vaccines.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24406392</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.12.046</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-410X
ispartof Vaccine, 2014-03, Vol.32 (11), p.1287-1295
issn 0264-410X
1873-2518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1505342352
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Allergy and Immunology
Animals
Antibodies, Protozoan - blood
Applied microbiology
Biological and medical sciences
Brazil
Canine immunization
Dog Diseases - parasitology
Dog Diseases - prevention & control
Dogs
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human protozoal diseases
Immunity, Humoral
Immunoglobulin G - blood
Infections
Infectious diseases
Leishmania infantum
Leishmaniasis Vaccines - adverse effects
Leishmaniasis Vaccines - therapeutic use
Leishmaniasis, Visceral - diagnosis
Leishmaniasis, Visceral - prevention & control
Leishmaniasis, Visceral - veterinary
Leishmune® and Leish-Tec
Leshmaniasis
Lutzomyia longipalpis
Male
Medical sciences
Microbiology
Parasites
Parasitic diseases
Parasitism
Prospective Studies
Protozoal diseases
Reactogenicity
Side effects
Vaccination - veterinary
Vaccines
Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects)
Vector-borne diseases
Xenodiagnosis
title Comparison of two commercial vaccines against visceral leishmaniasis in dogs from endemic areas: IgG, and subclasses, parasitism, and parasite transmission by xenodiagnosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T12%3A04%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20two%20commercial%20vaccines%20against%20visceral%20leishmaniasis%20in%20dogs%20from%20endemic%20areas:%20IgG,%20and%20subclasses,%20parasitism,%20and%20parasite%20transmission%20by%20xenodiagnosis&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Fernandes,%20Consuelo%20Barreto&rft.date=2014-03-05&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1287&rft.epage=1295&rft.pages=1287-1295&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft.coden=VACCDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.12.046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3220371631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1498442413&rft_id=info:pmid/24406392&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0264410X13017891&rfr_iscdi=true