Comparison of two commercial vaccines against visceral leishmaniasis in dogs from endemic areas: IgG, and subclasses, parasitism, and parasite transmission by xenodiagnosis

Highlights • Two commercial vaccines against canine visceral leishmaniasis were compared. • The outcome of vaccination of pet dogs was evaluated in endemic natural conditions. • A controlled prospective clinical approach was used to monitor the vaccinated dogs. • Post-vaccinal xenodiagnosis, serolog...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vaccine 2014-03, Vol.32 (11), p.1287-1295
Hauptverfasser: Fernandes, Consuelo Barreto, Junior, Jairo Torres Magalhães, de Jesus, Clauceane, Souza, Bárbara Maria Paraná da Silva, Larangeira, Daniela Farias, Fraga, Deborah Bittencourt Mothé, Tavares Veras, Patricia Sampaio, Barrouin-Melo, Stella Maria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Highlights • Two commercial vaccines against canine visceral leishmaniasis were compared. • The outcome of vaccination of pet dogs was evaluated in endemic natural conditions. • A controlled prospective clinical approach was used to monitor the vaccinated dogs. • Post-vaccinal xenodiagnosis, serology, parasitology, and clinical data were similar. • Reactogenicity and IgG subclass profile resulted in main differences among vaccines.
ISSN:0264-410X
1873-2518
DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.12.046