Comparison of two commercial vaccines against visceral leishmaniasis in dogs from endemic areas: IgG, and subclasses, parasitism, and parasite transmission by xenodiagnosis
Highlights • Two commercial vaccines against canine visceral leishmaniasis were compared. • The outcome of vaccination of pet dogs was evaluated in endemic natural conditions. • A controlled prospective clinical approach was used to monitor the vaccinated dogs. • Post-vaccinal xenodiagnosis, serolog...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2014-03, Vol.32 (11), p.1287-1295 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Highlights • Two commercial vaccines against canine visceral leishmaniasis were compared. • The outcome of vaccination of pet dogs was evaluated in endemic natural conditions. • A controlled prospective clinical approach was used to monitor the vaccinated dogs. • Post-vaccinal xenodiagnosis, serology, parasitology, and clinical data were similar. • Reactogenicity and IgG subclass profile resulted in main differences among vaccines. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.12.046 |