G-CSF treatment for STEMI: final 3-year follow-up of the randomised placebo-controlled STEM-AMI trial

Objective To assess whether granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment induces a sustained benefit on adverse remodelling in patients with large anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction after successful reperfusion. Methods The STEM-AMI T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2014-04, Vol.100 (7), p.574-581
Hauptverfasser: Achilli, Felice, Malafronte, Cristina, Maggiolini, Stefano, Lenatti, Laura, Squadroni, Lidia, Gibelli, Giuseppe, Capogrossi, Maurizio C, Dadone, Viola, Gentile, Francesco, Bassetti, Beatrice, Di Gennaro, Filiberto, Camisasca, Paola, Calchera, Ivan, Valagussa, Laura, Colombo, Gualtiero I, Pompilio, Giulio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To assess whether granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment induces a sustained benefit on adverse remodelling in patients with large anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction after successful reperfusion. Methods The STEM-AMI Trial was a prospective, placebo-controlled, multicentre study. Sixty consecutive patients with a first anterior STEMI, who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention 2–12 h after symptom onset, with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤45% measured by echocardiography within 12 h after successful revascularisation (TIMI flow score ≥2), were randomised 1:1 to G-CSF (5 µg/Kg body weight b.i.d.) or placebo. Clinical events and Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE) were monitored, and LVEF, LV end-diastolic (LVEDV) and end-systolic (LVESV) volumes, and infarct size were evaluated by MRI at the final 3-year follow-up. Results Fifty-four patients completed the study, of whom 35 with MRI. No significant differences were found in mortality and MACCE between G-CSF and placebo-treated groups. The 3-year infarct size was not different between groups, whereas LVEDV was significantly lower in G-CSF (n=20) than in placebo (n=15) patients (170.1±8.1 vs 197.2±8.9 mL, respectively; p=0.033 at analysis of covariance). A significant inverse correlation was detected in G-CSF patients between the number of circulating CD34 cells at 30 days after reperfusion and the 3-year absolute and indexed LVEDV (ρ=−0.71, 95% CI −0.90 to −0.30, and ρ=−0.62, −0.86 to −0.14, respectively), or their change over time (r=−0.59, −0.85 to −0.11, and r=−0.55, −0.83 to −0.06, respectively). Conclusions G-CSF therapy may be beneficial in attenuating ventricular remodelling subsequent to a large anterior STEMI in the long term. No differences have been detected in clinical outcome.
ISSN:1355-6037
1468-201X
DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304955