Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: Why Does the False Channel Remain Patent After Surgery?
Purpose: To understand why the false channel (FC) remains patent after surgery of type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD). Materials and Methods: Postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans of 129 patients operated for TAAAD were analyzed, and a color-Doppler ultrasound examination (CDU...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vascular and endovascular surgery 2014-04, Vol.48 (3), p.239-245 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose:
To understand why the false channel (FC) remains patent after surgery of type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD).
Materials and Methods:
Postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans of 129 patients operated for TAAAD were analyzed, and a color-Doppler ultrasound examination (CDUS) of the supra-aortic vessels (SAVs) was performed in 12 patients.
Results:
The FC remained patent in 107 (82.9%) patients. The entry site was situated near the distal anastomosis in 43 (40.2%) patients and far from it in 44 (41.1%) patients. In 10 (9.35%) patients, an entry site was observed only in the SAVs. In 10 (9.35%) patients, no entry site was seen. Of the 12 patients explored with CDUS, a retrograde filling of the FC was observed in 11 patients.
Conclusion:
The frequent postoperative circulating aortic FC can be explained by the persistence of the primary entry tear, the presence of iatrogenic tears, and/or a retrograde filling in the SAVs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1538-5744 1938-9116 |
DOI: | 10.1177/1538574413518611 |