Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: Why Does the False Channel Remain Patent After Surgery?

Purpose: To understand why the false channel (FC) remains patent after surgery of type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD). Materials and Methods: Postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans of 129 patients operated for TAAAD were analyzed, and a color-Doppler ultrasound examination (CDU...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vascular and endovascular surgery 2014-04, Vol.48 (3), p.239-245
Hauptverfasser: Bing, Fabrice, Rodière, Mathieu, Martinelli, Thomas, Monnin-Bares, Valérie, Chavanon, Olivier, Bach, Vincent, Baguet, Jean-Philippe, Ferretti, Gilbert R., Thony, Frédéric
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: To understand why the false channel (FC) remains patent after surgery of type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD). Materials and Methods: Postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans of 129 patients operated for TAAAD were analyzed, and a color-Doppler ultrasound examination (CDUS) of the supra-aortic vessels (SAVs) was performed in 12 patients. Results: The FC remained patent in 107 (82.9%) patients. The entry site was situated near the distal anastomosis in 43 (40.2%) patients and far from it in 44 (41.1%) patients. In 10 (9.35%) patients, an entry site was observed only in the SAVs. In 10 (9.35%) patients, no entry site was seen. Of the 12 patients explored with CDUS, a retrograde filling of the FC was observed in 11 patients. Conclusion: The frequent postoperative circulating aortic FC can be explained by the persistence of the primary entry tear, the presence of iatrogenic tears, and/or a retrograde filling in the SAVs.
ISSN:1538-5744
1938-9116
DOI:10.1177/1538574413518611