The influence of dispositional optimism on decision regret to undergo major breast reconstructive surgery
Background & Objectives It is not known if optimism influences regret following major reconstructive breast surgery. We examined the relationship between dispositional optimism, major complications and decision regret in patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction. Methods A consecut...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of surgical oncology 2013-12, Vol.108 (8), p.526-530 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background & Objectives
It is not known if optimism influences regret following major reconstructive breast surgery. We examined the relationship between dispositional optimism, major complications and decision regret in patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction.
Methods
A consecutive series of 290 patients were surveyed. Independent variables were: (1) dispositional optimism and (2) major complications. The primary outcome was Decision Regret. A multivariate regression analysis determined the relationship between the independent variables, confounders and decision regret.
Results
Of the 181 respondents, 63% reported no regret after breast reconstruction, 26% had mild regret, and 11% moderate to severe regret. Major complications did not have a significant effect on decision regret, and the impact of dispositional optimism was not significant in Caucasian women. There was a significant effect in non‐Caucasian women with less optimism who had significantly higher levels of mild regret 1.36 (CI 1.02–1.97) and moderate to severe regret 1.64 (CI 1.0–93.87).
Conclusions
This is the first paper to identify a subgroup of non‐Caucasian patients with low dispositional optimism who may be at risk for developing regret after microsurgical breast reconstruction. Possible strategies to ameliorate regret may involve addressing cultural and language barriers, setting realistic expectations, and providing more supports during the pre‐operative decision‐making phase. J. Surg. Oncol. 2013; 108:526–530. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4790 1096-9098 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jso.23437 |