Which Type of Atrophic Acne Scar (Ice‐pick, Boxcar, or Rolling) Responds to Nonablative Fractional Laser Therapy?

Background Few studies have examined the role of fractional lasers in individual acne scars (ice‐pick, box car, rolling) using objective assessment tools in darkly pigmented skin. Objective To evaluate the effect of 1,540‐nm fractional lasers on individual acne scars. Methods and Materials A prospec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dermatologic surgery 2014-03, Vol.40 (3), p.288-300
Hauptverfasser: Sardana, Kabir, Manjhi, Mukesh, Garg, Vijay K., Sagar, Vivek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Few studies have examined the role of fractional lasers in individual acne scars (ice‐pick, box car, rolling) using objective assessment tools in darkly pigmented skin. Objective To evaluate the effect of 1,540‐nm fractional lasers on individual acne scars. Methods and Materials A prospective interventional study was conducted in 35 patients using a 1,540‐nm fractional laser. Six sessions were performed with four passes per session and a dose varying from 70 to 100 mJ to maximize the DWR. A self‐devised objective assessment tool with dose settings to optimize the depth‐to‐width ratio (DWR) and a visual analog scale (VAS) were used to count individual atrophic scars. Final results were assessed 6 months after final laser treatment. Results Acne scar reduction efficiency was used to validate the improvement of individual scars, a meaningful difference was considered as 51% or greater improvement. The boxcar scars (52.9%) responded better than the rolling (43.1%) and ice‐pick scars (25.9%), with statistically significant improvement (p 
ISSN:1076-0512
1524-4725
DOI:10.1111/dsu.12428