The Ethics and Politics of Force-Feeding Terror Suspects in West German Prisons
Summary In February 1981, imprisoned members of the Red Army Faction launched a collective hunger strike that would eventually claim two lives. Prisoner Sigurd Debus famously died in April, and, in less sensational circumstances, prison physician Volker Leschhorn took his own life in January 1982. L...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social history of medicine : the journal of the Society for the Social History of Medicine 2012-05, Vol.25 (2), p.481-499 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Summary In February 1981, imprisoned members of the Red Army Faction launched a collective hunger strike that would eventually claim two lives. Prisoner Sigurd Debus famously died in April, and, in less sensational circumstances, prison physician Volker Leschhorn took his own life in January 1982. Leschhorn had become trapped between the competing interests at play during a hunger strike. At its core, the treatment of striking prisoners pits a prisoner's right to refuse food against a state's duty to protect that prisoner's life. In West Germany the neatness of this ethical contest was complicated, however, by a discursive layering that made force-feeding the locus for a broader conflict. This paper tracks the complex pressures that shaped West Germany's response to self-starvation in the 1970s and 1980s. It places the ethical, legal and political debates in their domestic and international contexts, and draws out the gap between theoretical debate and practical implementation. Adapted from the source document. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0951-631X 1477-4666 |
DOI: | 10.1093/shm/hkr164 |