Clinical and prognostic implications of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements in never-smokers with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma

Abstract Objectives The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic significance of anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK ) and c-ros oncogene 1 ( ROS1 ) rearrangement in never-smokers with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 162 consecutive nev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2014-03, Vol.83 (3), p.389-395
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Min Hwan, Shim, Hyo Sup, Kang, Dae Ryong, Jung, Ji Ye, Lee, Chang Young, Kim, Dae Joon, Lee, Jin Gu, Bae, Mi Kyung, Kim, Hye Ryun, Lim, Sun Min, Kim, Eun Young, Park, Ji Soo, Chung, Kyung Young, Kim, Hyun-Jung, Kim, Joo Hang, Cho, Byoung Chul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objectives The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic significance of anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK ) and c-ros oncogene 1 ( ROS1 ) rearrangement in never-smokers with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 162 consecutive never-smokers who underwent curative resection for stage IB to IIIA lung adenocarcinoma at a single institution. We concurrently analyzed mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) and v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog ( KRAS ) genes, and investigated ALK rearrangements by fluorescence in situ hybridization assay. ROS1 rearrangement was also determined in all triple ( EGFR/KRAS/ALK )-negative tumors. Results Of 162 never smokers with lung adenocarcinoma, 14 (8.6%) and 5 (3.1%) had ALK and ROS1 rearrangements, respectively. Nineteen of the 74 (25.7%) EGFR and KRAS mutation-negative patients were fusion-positive ( ALK or ROS1 fusion). Fusion-positive patients tended to have shorter median disease-free survival (DFS) than fusion-negative patients (28.0 vs. 33.9 months; p = 0.128). In multivariate analysis, fusion-positive patients had significantly poorer DFS than fusion-negative patients after adjustment for age, sex, T stage, N stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy use ( p = 0.022; hazard ratio, 2.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.19–4.30). The first recurrence sites were not significantly different between fusion-positive and fusion-negative patients in this study. Conclusion This study shows significantly poorer DFS of ALK or ROS1 fusion-positive lung adenocarcinoma in never-smokers after curative surgery.
ISSN:0169-5002
1872-8332
DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.01.003