Left ventricular twist during dobutamine stress echocardiography after acute myocardial infarction: association with reverse remodeling

Left ventricular (LV) twist is emerging as a marker of global LV contractility after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to describe stress-induced changes in LV twist during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) after AMI and investigate their association with LV reverse remodeli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2014-02, Vol.30 (2), p.313-322
Hauptverfasser: Joyce, Emer, Leong, Darryl P., Hoogslag, Georgette E., van Herck, Paul L., Debonnaire, Philippe, Abate, Elena, Holman, Eduard R., Schalij, Martin J., Bax, Jeroen J., Delgado, Victoria, Marsan, Nina Ajmone
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Left ventricular (LV) twist is emerging as a marker of global LV contractility after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to describe stress-induced changes in LV twist during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) after AMI and investigate their association with LV reverse remodeling at 6 months follow-up. In 82 consecutive first AMI patients (61 ± 12 years, 85 % male) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, DSE was performed at 3 months follow-up. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking-derived apical and basal rotation and LV twist were calculated at rest, low- and peak-dose stages. LV reverse remodeling was defined as ≥10 % decrease in LV end-systolic volume between baseline and 6 months follow-up. Patterns of LV twist response on DSE consisted of either a progressive increase throughout each stage (n = 18), an increase at either low- or peak-dose (n = 53) or no significant increase (n = 11). LV reverse remodeling occurred in 28 (34 %) patients, who showed significantly higher peak-dose LV twist (8.51° vs. 6.69°, p  = 0.03) and more frequently progressive LV twist increase from rest to peak-dose (39 vs. 13 %, p  
ISSN:1569-5794
1573-0743
1875-8312
DOI:10.1007/s10554-013-0351-2