REDD+ and the agriculture frontier: Understanding colonistsa utilization of the land

Given the importance of the agricultural frontier as an engine of deforestation, this paper focuses on how colonists (from the Spanish word for acolonistsa that is used to describe migrants to the agricultural frontier), who are important and largely overlooked stakeholders, perceive the new climate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Land use policy 2013-03, Vol.31, p.516-525
Hauptverfasser: St-Laurent, Guillaume, Gelinas, Nancy, Potvin, Catherine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Given the importance of the agricultural frontier as an engine of deforestation, this paper focuses on how colonists (from the Spanish word for acolonistsa that is used to describe migrants to the agricultural frontier), who are important and largely overlooked stakeholders, perceive the new climate mitigation mechanism known as Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation in developing countries (REDD+). We aimed (1) to document colonistsa land use, perceptions, needs, and aspirations and (2) to understand if and how they could be taken into account under REDD+ policies. The study, including multiple data collection techniques (e.g., focus group, interviews, and participatory activities), was conducted in eastern Panama. Three areas that were adjacent to the Province of Darien border were chosen because of their similar forested landscapes and varying accessibility to a main road. Our results suggest that land use preferences, culture, forest scarcity and dependency, inequalities (e.g., land use, amount of forest, and land area), and lack of technical capacities are key elements to be considered when developing a REDD+ strategy with colonist communities. We propose that halting deforestation without both considering local communitiesa perceptions and giving effective alternatives could seriously undermine livelihoods.
ISSN:0264-8377
DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.08.017