Biochemical methane potential of raw and pre-treated meat-processing wastes

► Biochemical methane potential (BMP) of pre-treated greaves and rinds were studied. ► BMP of rinds was improved 25% by exposure to 70°C for 24h. ► Incomplete hydrolysis of rinds caused inhibition of methanogens in the BMP assays. ► For greaves, hydrolysis was the limiting step even after the applie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioresource technology 2013-02, Vol.129, p.519-525
Hauptverfasser: Cavaleiro, A.J., Ferreira, T., Pereira, F., Tommaso, G., Alves, M.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► Biochemical methane potential (BMP) of pre-treated greaves and rinds were studied. ► BMP of rinds was improved 25% by exposure to 70°C for 24h. ► Incomplete hydrolysis of rinds caused inhibition of methanogens in the BMP assays. ► For greaves, hydrolysis was the limiting step even after the applied pre-treatments. Raw and pre-treated greaves and rinds, two meat-processing wastes, were assessed for biochemical methane potential (BMP). Combinations of temperature (25, 55, 70 and 120°C), NaOH (0.3gg−1 waste volatile solids) and lipase from Candida rugosa (10Ug−1 fat) were applied to promote wastes hydrolysis, and the effect on BMP was evaluated. COD solubilisation was higher (66% for greaves; 55% for rinds) when greaves were pre-treated with NaOH at 55°C and lipase was added to rinds after autoclaving. Maximum fat hydrolysis (52–54%) resulted from NaOH addition, at 55°C for greaves and 25°C for rinds. BMP of raw greaves and rinds was 707±46 and 756±56L CH4 (at standard temperature and pressure) kg−1VS, respectively. BMP of rinds improved 25% by exposure to 70°C; all other strategies tested had no positive effect on BMP of both wastes, and anaerobic biodegradability was even reduced by the combined action of base and temperature.
ISSN:0960-8524
1873-2976
0960-8524
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.083