Liquid hot water pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse and its comparison with chemical pretreatment methods for the sugar recovery and structural changes

► Liquid hot water process has no chemical addition but a good sugar recovery. ► Ultrastructural change of cell wall was observed for different pretreated samples. ► Lignin can migrate within and out of the cell wall in the hydrothermal pretreatment. ► A combined pretreatment with liquid hot water a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioresource technology 2013-02, Vol.129, p.592-598
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Qiang, Zhuang, Xinshu, Lv, Shuangliang, He, Minchao, Zhang, Yu, Yuan, Zhenhong, Qi, Wei, Wang, Qiong, Wang, Wen, Tan, Xuesong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► Liquid hot water process has no chemical addition but a good sugar recovery. ► Ultrastructural change of cell wall was observed for different pretreated samples. ► Lignin can migrate within and out of the cell wall in the hydrothermal pretreatment. ► A combined pretreatment with liquid hot water and aqueous ammonia was proposed. Liquid hot water (LHW), dilute hydrochloric acid (HCl) and dilute sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were applied to sugarcane bagasse (SB). Application of the same analytical methods and material balance approaches facilitated meaningful comparisons of glucose and xylose yields from combined pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. All pretreatments enhanced sugar recovery from pretreatment and subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis substantially compared to untreated sugarcane bagasse. Adding Tween80 in the enzymatic hydrolysis process increased the conversion level of glucan/xylan by 0.3-fold, especially for the low pH pretreatment where more lignin was left in the solids. The total sugar recovery from sugarcane bagasse with the coupled operations of pretreatment and 72h enzymatic digestion reached 71.6% for LHW process, 76.6% for HCl pretreatment and 77.3% for NaOH pretreatment. Different structural changes at the plant tissue, cellular, and cell wall levels might be responsible for the different enzymatic digestibility. Furthermore, a combined LHW and aqueous ammonia pretreatment was proposed to reduce energy input and enhance the sugar recovery.
ISSN:0960-8524
1873-2976
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.099