Estimating the value of watershed services following forest restoration

Key Points WTP for upland watershed restoration is $183.50/yr per household Annual benefits of upland forest restoration are $400,000 Benefits have a policy application for forested watershed restoration Declining forest health, climate change, and development threaten the sustainability of water su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water resources research 2013-04, Vol.49 (4), p.1773-1781
Hauptverfasser: Mueller, Julie M., Swaffar, Wes, Nielsen, Erik A., Springer, Abraham E., Lopez, Sharon Masek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Key Points WTP for upland watershed restoration is $183.50/yr per household Annual benefits of upland forest restoration are $400,000 Benefits have a policy application for forested watershed restoration Declining forest health, climate change, and development threaten the sustainability of water supplies in the western United States. While forest restoration may buffer threats to watershed services, funding shortfalls for landscape‐scale restoration efforts limit management action. The hydrologic response and reduction in risk to watersheds following forest restoration treatments could create significant nonmarket benefits for downstream water users. Historic experimental watershed studies indicate a significant and positive response from forest thinning by a reallocation of water from evapotranspiration to surface‐water yield. In this study, we estimate the willingness to pay (WTP) for improved watershed services for one group of downstream users, irrigators, following forest restoration activities. We find a positive and statistically significant WTP within our sample of $183.50 per household, at an aggregated benefit of more than $400,000 annually for 2181 irrigators. Our benefit estimate provides evidence that downstream irrigators may be willing to invest in landscape‐scale forest restoration to maintain watershed services.
ISSN:0043-1397
1944-7973
DOI:10.1002/wrcr.20163