Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
To the Editor: Mitchell (Oct. 24 issue) 1 highlights the fact that reimbursement drives behavior in physicians who treat prostate cancer. Yet, we are concerned that she may be perpetuating a myth with the statement “. . . evidence suggests that for low-risk disease, the three primary definitive trea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2014-02, Vol.370 (7), p.679-680 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To the Editor:
Mitchell (Oct. 24 issue)
1
highlights the fact that reimbursement drives behavior in physicians who treat prostate cancer. Yet, we are concerned that she may be perpetuating a myth with the statement “. . . evidence suggests that for low-risk disease, the three primary definitive treatments are clinically equivalent when measured in terms of survival.” Although it is true that survival rates associated with these treatments are similar, Mitchell did not point out that that no randomized trial in the era of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing has ever shown that definitive treatment of low-risk prostate cancer, as compared with observation, . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMc1314524 |