Obstetric outcomes of patients with abortus imminens in the first trimester

Purpose We aimed to find out the effect of abortus imminens (AI) on obstetric outcomes of pregnancies which continued beyond the 24th week of gestation. Methods In this prospective study, 309 patients with AI were divided into high-risk group (with a risk factor for spontaneous abortus) ( n  = 92) a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2014-03, Vol.289 (3), p.499-504
Hauptverfasser: Evrenos, Ayşe Nur, Cakir Gungor, Ayse Nur, Gulerman, Cavidan, Cosar, Emine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose We aimed to find out the effect of abortus imminens (AI) on obstetric outcomes of pregnancies which continued beyond the 24th week of gestation. Methods In this prospective study, 309 patients with AI were divided into high-risk group (with a risk factor for spontaneous abortus) ( n  = 92) and low-risk group (without a risk factor) ( n  = 217). The control group ( n  = 308) was chosen randomly. Results In AI group, preterm delivery, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), cesarean section (C/S) delivery, postpartum uterine atony and need of a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) rates were significantly higher than control group. Gestational diabetes mellitus, PPROM, still birth, low APGAR scores were seen more frequently in the high-risk patients than in the control group. Furthermore in the high-risk group, preterm delivery, malpresentation, C/S delivery and need of NICU were increased much more than in the low-risk group. Gestational hypertension/preeclampsia, oligo/polyhydramniosis, intrauterine growth retardation, placenta previa, abruption of placenta, chorioamnionitis, congenital abnormalities, delivery induction, cephalopelvic disproportion, fetal distress and manual removal of placenta were not different among the groups. Conclusions Patients with AI history, especially with high-risk factors can have adverse obstetric and neonatal results. So their antenatal follow-up has to be done cautiously for the early signs and symptoms of these complications.
ISSN:0932-0067
1432-0711
DOI:10.1007/s00404-013-2979-5