Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar : a content comprehensiveness comparison

Compares the three citation resources ISI Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar to identify the citation resource with the most representative South African scholarly environmental sciences citation coverage. Source: National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Matauranga o Aotearoa, licensed by the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Electronic library 2013-01, Vol.31 (6), p.727-744
Hauptverfasser:	Adriaanse, Leslie S, Rensleigh, Chris
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Accreditation Cartography Citation analysis Citation indexes Comparative Analysis Comparisons Completeness Conservation (Environment) Content analysis (Communication) Counting Coverage Discipline Entomology Environmental science Environmental sciences Exact sciences and technology Geology Information and communication sciences Information science. Documentation Intellectual Disciplines Libraries Library and information science. General aspects Marine Biology Methodology Musical Composition Organic Chemistry Periodicals Reproduction Research Design Research Methodology Research Problems Sciences and techniques of general use Search engines Sequences Soil Science Soil sciences Studies Sustainable Development Wildlife conservation Zoology
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Compares the three citation resources ISI Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar to identify the citation resource with the most representative South African scholarly environmental sciences citation coverage. Source: National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Matauranga o Aotearoa, licensed by the Department of Internal Affairs for re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand Licence.
ISSN:	0264-0473 1758-616X
DOI:	10.1108/EL-12-2011-0174