A randomized comparison of caudal block by sacral hiatus injection under ultrasound guidance with traditional sacral canal injection in children

Summary Background There is a risk of inadvertent dural or vascular puncture for the traditional single‐shot caudal block performed by inserting the needle into the sacral canal through the sacral hiatus. This prospective, randomized study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility of the hiatus injec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatric anesthesia 2013-05, Vol.23 (5), p.395-400
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Li-Zhong, Hu, Xiao-Xia, Zhang, Ying-Fa, Chang, Xiang-Yang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background There is a risk of inadvertent dural or vascular puncture for the traditional single‐shot caudal block performed by inserting the needle into the sacral canal through the sacral hiatus. This prospective, randomized study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility of the hiatus injection under ultrasound guidance for caudal block in children. Methods 140 ASA I–II children undergoing inguinal hernia repair were randomly allocated to one of two groups (Group C or Group H, n = 70). 1 ml·kg−1 of 0.25% ropivacaine was injected after the needle was inserted into the sacral canal in Group C, or after the needle pierced the sacrococcygeal ligament under a transverse ultrasound view in Group H. Success rate of block, puncture frequency, complications, and durations of block were recorded. Results The success rate of block was similar between two groups (95.7% in Group C vs 92.8% in Group H, P > 0.05). The first puncture success rate was higher, and the durations of block were shorter in Group H than in Group C (92.8% vs 60% and 145 ± 23s vs 164 ± 31s, respectively P 
ISSN:1155-5645
1460-9592
DOI:10.1111/pan.12104