Diagnosis of Complex Renal Cystic Masses and Solid Renal Lesions Using PET Imaging: Comparison of 11C-Acetate and 18F-FDG PET Imaging

PURPOSEThe study aims to assess the usefulness of PET with C-acetate and F-FDG to differentiate renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from complicated renal cysts. METHODSThirty-one patients were enrolled, 14 patients with complicated renal cysts (12 with Bosniak III and 2 with Bosniak IV) and 17 patients with 19 solid renal tumors. The patients underwent both C-acetate PET and FDG PET. Nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy was performed after the PET scans. RESULTSIn 29 patients, 32 renal lesions were diagnosed as RCC. Twenty-three of the 32 RCCs (72%) had positive C-acetate PET findings, whereas only 7 FDG PET studies were positive (22%). Considering the relationship between tumor size measured by macroscopic appearance of resected tumors and PET results, 22 of 25 (88%) tumors more than 1.5 cm showed positive C-acetate PET findings. In 12 patients with Bosniak III renal cysts, 10 renal lesions were diagnosed as RCC. In this subgroup, 5 of the 10 RCCs (50%) had positive C-acetate PET findings, whereas 2 RCCs (20%) had positive FDG PET findings. None of the cases with benign findings had positive C-acetate PET or FDG PET scans. CONCLUSIONSC-acetate PET demonstrates a pronounced increase in tracer uptake in RCC, especially in renal tumors more than 1.5 cm, and displays a higher sensitivity than FDG PET. These preliminary data show that C-acetate may be a useful PET tracer to exclude RCC in complex renal cysts.