Diagnostic performance of low-dose rest/stress Tc-99m tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion SPECT using the 530c CZT camera: Quantitative vs visual analysis

We set out to develop normal databases and prospectively validate abnormality criteria for a low-dose Tc-99m tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion SPECT protocol using the 530c CZT camera. All patients received 6 mCi rest/20 mCi stress doses of Tc-99m tetrofosmin. Rest and stress images were obtained ove...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of nuclear cardiology 2014-02, Vol.21 (1), p.158-165
Hauptverfasser: Esteves, Fabio P., Galt, James R., Folks, Russell D., Verdes, Liudmila, Garcia, Ernest V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We set out to develop normal databases and prospectively validate abnormality criteria for a low-dose Tc-99m tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion SPECT protocol using the 530c CZT camera. All patients received 6 mCi rest/20 mCi stress doses of Tc-99m tetrofosmin. Rest and stress images were obtained over 7-9 and 5-7 minutes according to the chest size. Low-dose CT of the chest was obtained on a standalone CT scanner. Forty patients with very low likelihood (LLK) of coronary artery disease (CAD) were used to define the normal count distributions. The abnormality criteria were prospectively validated in 55 patients who had coronary angiography and in 40 patients with LLK of CAD. The results for quantitative non-attenuation-corrected (AC) and AC analysis and visual analysis were as follows: sensitivity of 79%, 85%, and 92% (P = NS) and specificity of 44%, 75%, and 56% (P = NS), respectively. The normalcy rates for quantitative non-AC and AC analyses and visual analysis were 95%, 98%, and 98% (P = NS). We have developed non-AC and AC normal databases for low-dose rest/stress Tc-99m tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion SPECT protocol using the 530c CZT camera. The per-patient diagnostic performance of quantitative analyses is not significantly different from visual analysis by an experienced reader.
ISSN:1071-3581
1532-6551
DOI:10.1007/s12350-013-9827-7