A Novel Noninvasive Technology for Treatment Planning Using Virtual Coronary Stenting and Computed Tomography-Derived Computed Fractional Flow Reserve

Objectives This study sought to determine whether computational modeling can be used to predict the functional outcome of coronary stenting by virtual stenting of ischemia-causing stenoses identified on the pre-treatment model. Background Computed tomography (CT)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JACC. Cardiovascular interventions 2014, Vol.7 (1), p.72-78
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Kyung-Hee, MD, Doh, Joon-Hyung, MD, Koo, Bon-Kwon, MD, Min, James K., MD, Erglis, Andrejs, MD, Yang, Han-Mo, MD, Park, Kyung-Woo, MD, Lee, Hae-Young, MD, Kang, Hyun-Jae, MD, Kim, Yong-Jin, MD, Lee, Sung Yun, MD, Kim, Hyo-Soo, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives This study sought to determine whether computational modeling can be used to predict the functional outcome of coronary stenting by virtual stenting of ischemia-causing stenoses identified on the pre-treatment model. Background Computed tomography (CT)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a novel noninvasive technology that can provide computed (FFR ct ) using standard coronary CT angiography protocols. Methods We prospectively enrolled 44 patients (48 lesions) who had coronary CT angiography before angiography and stenting, and invasively measured FFR before and after stenting. FFR ct was computed in blinded fashion using coronary CT angiography and computational fluid dynamics before and after virtual coronary stenting. Virtual stenting was performed by modification of the computational model to restore the area of the target lesion according to the proximal and distal reference areas. Results Before intervention, invasive FFR was 0.70 ± 0.14 and noninvasive FFR ct was 0.70 ± 0.15. FFR after stenting and FFR ct after virtual stenting were 0.90 ± 0.05 and 0.88 ± 0.05, respectively (R = 0.55, p < 0.001). The mean difference between FFR ct and FFR was 0.006 for pre-intervention (95% limit of agreement: –0.27 to 0.28) and 0.024 for post-intervention (95% limit of agreement: –0.08 to 0.13). Diagnostic accuracy of FFR ct to predict ischemia (FFR ≤0.8) prior to stenting was 77% (sensitivity: 85.3%, specificity: 57.1%, positive predictive value: 83%, and negative predictive value: 62%) and after stenting was 96% (sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 96% positive predictive value: 50%, and negative predictive value: 100%). Conclusions Virtual coronary stenting of CT-derived computational models is feasible, and this novel noninvasive technology may be useful in predicting functional outcome after coronary stenting. (Virtual Coronary Intervention and Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR]; NCT01478100 )
ISSN:1936-8798
1876-7605
DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.024