Biomechanical and Bone Histomorphological Evaluation of Two Surfaces on Tapered and Cylindrical Root Form Implants: An Experimental Study in Dogs

ABSTRACT Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the early bone response of tapered and cylindrical root form implants with two different surface treatments in fresh extraction sockets after 4 and 8 weeks. Materials and Methods: Surface treatments and implant design comprised (n = 9 each): ta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2013-12, Vol.15 (6), p.799-808
Hauptverfasser: Negri, Bruno, Calvo-Guirado, José Luis, Maté Sánchez de Val, José Eduardo, Delgado Ruiz, Rafael Arcesio, Ramírez Fernández, María Piedad, Gómez Moreno, Gerardo, Aguilar Salvatierra, Antonio, Guardia, Javier, Muñoz Guzón, Fernando
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACT Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the early bone response of tapered and cylindrical root form implants with two different surface treatments in fresh extraction sockets after 4 and 8 weeks. Materials and Methods: Surface treatments and implant design comprised (n = 9 each): tapered with dual acid‐etched surface; tapered with dual acid‐etched and sandblasted surface (T DAE SB); cylindrical with dual acid‐etched surface (C DAE); and cylindrical with dual acid‐etched and sandblasted surface (C DAE SB). Implants were placed in the distal sockets of mandibular premolars (2P2,3P3,4P4) of six beagle dogs, remaining in vivo for 4 and 8 weeks. After sacrifice, the implants were subjected to torque to the point of interface fracture and subsequently nondecalcified for histomorphological study. Statistical analysis was performed by a General Linear Model (GLM) analysis of variance model with a significance level of 5%. Results: Torque to interface fracture was significantly greater for the C DAE SB group than for the other groups (p 
ISSN:1523-0899
1708-8208
DOI:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00431.x