Standardizing minimal residual disease by flow cytometry for precursor B lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a developing country

Background: In addition to standard risk criteria at diagnosis, minimal residual disease (MRD) following initiation of therapy is a well‐recognized risk factor to predict relapse. Literature from developing countries addressing therapeutic or laboratory practices related to MRD, is largely lacking....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry Clinical cytometry, 2012-07, Vol.82B (4), p.252-258
Hauptverfasser: Patkar, Nikhil, Alex, Ansu Abu, B., Bargavi, Ahmed, Rayaz, Abraham, Aby, George, Biju, Vishwabandya, Auro, Srivastava, Alok, Mathews, Vikram
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: In addition to standard risk criteria at diagnosis, minimal residual disease (MRD) following initiation of therapy is a well‐recognized risk factor to predict relapse. Literature from developing countries addressing therapeutic or laboratory practices related to MRD, is largely lacking. In a first paper from India, we describe our experience in establishing a flow cytometry‐based MRD assay for precursor B lineage ALL (BCP‐ALL) with emphasis on the assay standardization and cost. Methods: Normal templates for B cell development were established in 10 control patients using CD45, CD11a, CD38, CD20, CD10, CD19, CD58, CD34, CD123, and CD22. BCP‐ALL samples (n = 42) were characterized at diagnosis to identify a suitable marker for follow‐up during mid (D+21) and end of induction (D+33). Both, multiparametric immunophenotyping and single marker detection of LAIP were used for data analysis. Results: In 95.2% of BCP‐ALL at least two informative markers could be obtained when a minimum of four cocktail combinations were used. The combination CD20, CD10, CD45, and CD19 was the most useful (71.4%) followed by combinations containing CD38 (66.7%), CD22 (57.1%), CD11a (52.4%), and CD58 (33.3%). Using our approach, 60 and 47% of patients had detectable MRD at mid and end induction time points, respectively. Conclusion: We have described a relatively cost effective MRD panel which is applicable to over 90% of patients. We hope that this data would encourage more centers in India and other resource constrained health delivery systems to develop MRD assays. © 2012 International Clinical Cytometry Society
ISSN:1552-4949
1552-4957
DOI:10.1002/cyto.b.21017