Efficacy of zinc oxides as fertilisers
Background and aims Human zinc (Zn) deficiency is prevalent in developing countries and Zn biofortification of grains is used to increase the Zn content of food staples. Agronomic interventions to biofortify grain involve fertiliser selection and management. The usefulness of a zinc compound as a fe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant and soil 2014-01, Vol.374 (1/2), p.843-855 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background and aims Human zinc (Zn) deficiency is prevalent in developing countries and Zn biofortification of grains is used to increase the Zn content of food staples. Agronomic interventions to biofortify grain involve fertiliser selection and management. The usefulness of a zinc compound as a fertiliser will depend on its solubility, bioavailability and the effect of its distribution in the soil profile. Methods Various sources of Zn oxide and Zn sulfate fertiliser were characterised for nutrient content, morphology, solubility, and fertiliser recovery when applied to the surface, banded near the seed or uniformly mixed. Results Compared with Zn sulfates, Zn oxide fertilisers had very low water solubility and slow dissolution rates, because of a higher dissolution pH. This did not translate to a diminished ability to supply Zn to plants when both sources of Zn were mixed through the soil, but there was significantly less fertiliser recovery from Zn oxides than from Zn sulfates when the fertiliser was banded near the seed. Conclusions All sources will be equally effective if uniformly mixed through the profile. In no-till systems where fertiliser is banded near seed, Zn sulfate is superior to Zn oxide. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0032-079X 1573-5036 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11104-013-1919-2 |