Comparison of outcomes after minimally invasive versus open partial nephrectomy with respect to trainee involvement utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

Complication rates of open partial nephrectomies (OPN) and minimally invasive partial nephrectomies (MIPN) have largely been reported by single and multi-institutional tertiary care centers. We sought to identify complication rates of these approaches and how they are influenced by trainee involveme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endourology 2014-01, Vol.28 (1), p.40-47
Hauptverfasser: Kern, Sean Quigley, Lustik, Michael B, McMann, Leah P, Thibault, Gregory P, Sterbis, Joseph R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Complication rates of open partial nephrectomies (OPN) and minimally invasive partial nephrectomies (MIPN) have largely been reported by single and multi-institutional tertiary care centers. We sought to identify complication rates of these approaches and how they are influenced by trainee involvement utilizing an independent national surgical database. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) is a risk-adjusted data collection analyzing risk factors, demographics, and 30-day perioperative outcomes. From 2005 to 2010, we identified 1251 partial nephrectomies, of which 525 were MIPN and 726 were OPN. Analysis showed a decreased risk of overall morbidity, serious morbidity, and surgical site infections (SSIs); specifically superficial SSI, urinary tract infection, and bleeding (p
ISSN:0892-7790
1557-900X
DOI:10.1089/end.2013.0051