Effect of funding source on publication bias is not so clear cut

Of the 150 unpublished industry funded studies, 38 (25%) had results available on ClinicalTrials.gov, whereas none of the 11 unpublished trials funded by the National Institutes of Health or the 20 unpublished trials with other funding sources provided results in this database. Role of editorial and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ (Online) 2013-12, Vol.347 (dec23 5), p.f7582-f7582
Hauptverfasser: van Lent, Marlies, Out, Henk Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Of the 150 unpublished industry funded studies, 38 (25%) had results available on ClinicalTrials.gov, whereas none of the 11 unpublished trials funded by the National Institutes of Health or the 20 unpublished trials with other funding sources provided results in this database. Role of editorial and peer review processes in publication bias: analysis of drug trials submitted to 8 medical journals.
ISSN:0959-8138
1756-1833
1756-1833
DOI:10.1136/bmj.f7582